Homework Help: Improper Integral with x>0 and a>2

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the improper integral \(\int_{0}^\infty \frac{\sqrt[3]{x}-\sqrt{x}}{x^b+a^b}dx\) under the conditions \(x>0\) and \(a>2\). Participants explore various mathematical techniques and concepts related to improper integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the integral to the Beta function but expresses uncertainty about the transformation process. Some participants suggest using known integral results and rescaling techniques, while others question the existence of the integral itself and discuss the implications of divergent terms.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering different perspectives on the integral's convergence and potential methods for evaluation. Some guidance has been provided regarding integral properties, but no consensus has been reached on a specific approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the integral's formulation and the use of complex analysis techniques, with some participants noting a lack of familiarity with certain mathematical concepts relevant to the problem.

springo
Messages
125
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find:
[tex]\int_{0}^\infty \frac{\sqrt[3]{x}-\sqrt{x}}{x^b+a^b}dx[/tex]
With x>0 and a>2.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I think it's probably something with Beta, but I'm not sure how to change it into the proper form.
I thought changing it into:
[tex]\int_{0}^\infty \frac{\sqrt[3]{x}-\sqrt{x}}{x^b\left(1+\left(\frac{a}{x}\right)^b\right)}dx[/tex]
And then doing:
[tex]\tan^2 t = \left(\frac{a}{x}\right)^b[/tex]
But it makes things too complicated, so I guess it's not the way to go.

Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can compute integrals of these forms easily by using this result:

[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{x^{-p}}{1+x}dx =\frac{\pi}{\sin(\pi p)}[/tex]

for 0<p<1. This result is very easy to prove using contour integration.

If you start from this, you can do a rescaling to change the 1 in the denominator to some other value. You can change the x in the denominator to u^r.

You can also consider an integrand consisting of a linear combination of terms of the above form such that the individual terms would not converge when integrated separately. Nevertheless, you can still pretend that the divergent integrals are given by the (appropriately generalized version of) the above formula and then take the appropriate linear combination. The validity of such a calculation then follows from an analytical continuation argument.
 
Everything looks constant to me with the "dt" in there, or maybe I'm insane.
 
chriscolose is right (and not insane). The integral as stated does not exist. Its anti-derivative is just a constant (depending on parameters a and x) times t which goes to infinity as t goes to infinity.

Count Iblis assume the O.P. meant
[tex]\int_{0}^\infty \frac{\sqrt[3]{x}-\sqrt{x}}{x^b+a^b}dx[/tex]
 
Sorry about that, I meant dx...

@Count Ibis: I haven't studied contour integration, I have studied line integral/path integrals, but nothing with complex variables... I never heard about that result, just the one with Γ(p)Γ(1-p) which yields the same result.
I think I need to do this with my standard Γ and B results.

I just thought of:
[tex]\tan^2 t = \left(\frac{x}{a}\right)^b[/tex]
Factorizing ab.
Could that work?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K