Horizon in AdS/CFT: CFT in Black Hole Spacetime

  • Thread starter Thread starter atyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ads/cft Horizon
atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,379
In a spacetime with a black hole, where is the horizon in the CFT?

Also, if a black hole spacetime corresponds to a thermal CFT, doesn't that mean the CFT is in a box where there is still a universe outside to provide a temperature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, here there are two copies of the CFT and one of them is averaged over.
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0106112
Eternal Black Holes in AdS
Juan M. Maldacena

I wonder if this has held up?

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9903237
AdS/CFT and the Information Paradox
D.A. Lowe, L. Thorlacius

http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.0263
Black Holes as Effective Geometries
Vijay Balasubramanian, Jan de Boer, Sheer El-Showk, Ilies Messamah

http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.1038
The information paradox: A pedagogical introduction
Samir D. Mathur
 
Last edited:
atyy said:
In a spacetime with a black hole, where is the horizon in the CFT?

Also, if a black hole spacetime corresponds to a thermal CFT, doesn't that mean the CFT is in a box where there is still a universe outside to provide a temperature?

You have to assume that the black hole is coupled to a heat bath such that the temperature remains constant and it's in thermal equilibrium. Then the black hole will remain at some temperature forever.


The CFT is finite and unbounded as is the horizon of the black hole. So the CFT isn't in a box since a box has bounds. Therefore the CFT doesn't need a heat bath because there is no where for the heat to flow from/to. So the whole CFT is the horizon.
 
Finbar said:
You have to assume that the black hole is coupled to a heat bath such that the temperature remains constant and it's in thermal equilibrium. Then the black hole will remain at some temperature forever.


The CFT is finite and unbounded as is the horizon of the black hole. So the CFT isn't in a box since a box has bounds. Therefore the CFT doesn't need a heat bath because there is no where for the heat to flow from/to. So the whole CFT is the horizon.

So if the CFT is the whole universe, then the universe will be in a mixed state - but how can that be - quantum mechanically, shouldn't there be only pure states when it comes to the whole universe?
 
atyy said:
So if the CFT is the whole universe, then the universe will be in a mixed state - but how can that be - quantum mechanically, shouldn't there be only pure states when it comes to the whole universe?

In the case of the eternal black hole discussed by Maldecena in your first link, there are actually two copies of the CFT. The black hole geometry is an approximate description of an entangled state of the two CFTs. This entangled state has the property that it looks exactly thermal to each CFT individually. Additionally, the CFTs are unable to communicate due to the black hole horizons.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top