Horizontal velocity experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an experiment to determine gravitational acceleration (g) using a ball dropped from varying heights with an initial horizontal velocity. The initial proposal suggests measuring horizontal distances traveled by the ball from heights of 5m and 10m, but the calculations presented indicate that the values given (10m and 13m) may be incorrect. A detailed mathematical analysis shows that the relationship between horizontal distance and gravitational acceleration leads to a cancellation of g, suggesting that the method may not yield a definitive value for g without knowing the horizontal velocity. The conversation concludes with the realization that a geometrical method for calculating g based on the observed parabolas of the falling balls is not feasible. Overall, the experiment highlights the complexities involved in measuring gravitational acceleration without precise timing or velocity data.
jay
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hai all,
In projectiles the horizondal component of their velocity remains constant and veritical compont changes as it gets accelarated.So with this, I think we can find an experiment that gives the accelaration due to gravity(g) without a clock.i.e if we are droping a ball from a table of height 5m with some horizondal velocity(its veritical component will be zero initialy)it reaches a horizondal distance of 10m at the bottom from the table.If we repeate this experiment with a table of height 10m and with same ball and same horizondal velocity the horizondal distance traveled is 13m.Then i don't know is there any way to calculate the accelaration due to gravity at that place.Any way it is clear that ball travels its second 5m (vertical) faster in its 10m drop.
Anyway if a clock is a must for calculating 'g' please say why?

**These values are not correct...


Jay..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are saying is this: Have an object on a 5 m high table, and give it an initial velocity v0. Horizontal acceleration is 0 and vertical acceleration is -g. At time t, the horizontal speed is v0 and vertical speed is -gt. At time t, the horizontal distance from the table is v0t and height is 5- (g/2)t2. The object hits the ground when
5- (g/2)t2= 0 or t= √(10/g) and will hit the ground at distance v0&radic(10/g). Let's assume that is 10 m as you say.
If the height of the table is 10 m (Gosh, those are high tables!),
the same calculation gives v0&radic(20/g) as the distance at which the object hits the floor. Assume that is 13 m.
We now have v0&radic(10/g)= 10 and v]0&radic(20/g)= 13. From the first equation, 10/g= 100/v02 so g= v02/10. From the second equation, v02= 169g/20;. That gives g= (169g)/200.
Hmmm, the "g"s cancel out! Ain't that a kick in the head!

(I also suspect that your "13 m" and "10 m" values are not correct!)
 
Theoretically, there is no need to compare it to a second experiment (although it is a good idea to make sure that there wasn't an error!).

If the experiment is performed in a vacuum so there is no air resistance:

For the horizontal velocity, the following equation applies:
d = vxt
So, t = d/vx

You know d and vx.

Replace t with this value in the equation for vertical postions

y = y0 - 1/2gt^2
y = y0 - .5g(d/vx)^2

Pluge in the values. Let c = (d/vx)^2.
0 = 5 - .5gc
10/c = g
 
I may have not understood your question. Do you know the horizontal velocity, or do you just know that it is the same for both experiments?
 
Don't know velocity

I tried it without knowing horizontal velocity.If I know that it is very easy as u said.I asked for some kind of geometrical methods for calculation,by comparing two parabolas made by falling balls.But now i think it is not possible.
Thank you.

Jay
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top