How Accurate Are My Chemistry Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BittersweetLove
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine the moles of Li3N produced from 8.5 moles of Li, one must consider the stoichiometry of the reaction rather than simply adding moles of nitrogen. For calculating the number of atoms in 20.5 g of carbon, the correct approach involves using Avogadro's number and the molar mass of carbon to find the total number of atoms. The discussion also seeks clarification on the three basic types of compounds used as antacids, with suggestions to first write and balance the relevant chemical equations. Accurate calculations require understanding of chemical formulas and stoichiometry principles. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of proper methodology in chemistry calculations.
BittersweetLove
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Am I doing these right??

1)How many moles of Li3N will be produced if you begin with 8.5 moles of Li ?

**Do I just find the moles for 3N and add them to the 8.5 moles of Li?**


2)Calculate the number of atoms in 20.5 g Carbon

**I guess I would Multiply Carbon's atoms by 20.5?**


3)What are the three basic types of compounds that are used as antacids?

**I have no idea whatsoever! I've looked everywhere for the answer. Please help!**
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) write first the equation
2) 12 gr C contains 6.027*10^23 atoms how mutch is this for 20.5 g?
3) antacids is this formic acid?
 
Like mit already said first write the equation, balance it, then determine the limiting reactant.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
11K
Back
Top