How accurate is a Guess in statistics.

  • Thread starter Thread starter ranyart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of statistical probabilities and their interpretation. Participants question the notion of outcomes being viewed as a "Law like" process, emphasizing that there are typically multiple outcomes rather than a single definitive one. They clarify that mathematical probability is based on given distributions and is not observer dependent. The accuracy of a guess in this context is deemed impossible to quantify. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clearer definitions in discussing statistical concepts.
ranyart
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
In Stastitical Probabilities, the outcome is intepreted as a fundamental 'Law like' process.

Is this based on observer dependance?

P.S How accurate is a Guess?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First, I have absolutely no idea what you mean by "Statistical Probabilities". Are there other kinds of probabilities?

Second, I have no idea where you got the idea that, in any kind of probability, "the outcome is intepreted as a fundamental 'Law like' process. "

For one thing, there are usually many "outcomes" not "the outcome". Also, in mathematical probablility, we are typically "given" the underlying probability distribution but I would not call that 'Law like'.

If that is what you are talking about, then, no, it is not "observer dependent". Of course, when you are applying a mathematical model to a statistical problem, you might approximate the given distribution by one based on observation.

Finally, it's impossible to say how "accurate" a "guess" is.
 
Originally posted by HallsofIvy
First, I have absolutely no idea what you mean by "Statistical Probabilities". Are there other kinds of probabilities?

Second, I have no idea where you got the idea that, in any kind of probability, "the outcome is intepreted as a fundamental 'Law like' process. "

For one thing, there are usually many "outcomes" not "the outcome". Also, in mathematical probablility, we are typically "given" the underlying probability distribution but I would not call that 'Law like'.

If that is what you are talking about, then, no, it is not "observer dependent". Of course, when you are applying a mathematical model to a statistical problem, you might approximate the given distribution by one based on observation.

Finally, it's impossible to say how "accurate" a "guess" is.


Thanks Ivy, it was a hasty posting I had been flying around a number a site's looking for a defined explination:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_probability

But your reply is correct in that my post was ill-defined, thanks.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top