How Accurate Is Lucy's Measurement of Gravity in Melbourne?

AI Thread Summary
Lucy is measuring the acceleration due to gravity in Melbourne by timing a ball drop from a height of 1.00 m, recording times of 0.47 s, 0.42 s, 0.48 s, and 0.41 s. The uncertainties in her measurements are 1 cm for distance and 0.01 s for timing. Calculating the average time gives 0.45 s with an uncertainty of ±0.04 s, but the derived acceleration value of 11.78 m/s² does not match the provided multiple-choice options. The discussion suggests that the question may focus on calculating the uncertainty in the value of g rather than the acceleration itself, highlighting potential confusion regarding the expected approach. Accurate propagation of error is emphasized as a critical aspect of the calculation.
Ruturaj Vaidya
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
Lucy is measuring the acceleration due to gravity in Melbourne by dropping a ball through a vertical distance 1.00 m and timing how long it takes.
The ball starts at rest, and Lucy times its fall four times. The results are: 0.47 s, 0.42 s, 0.48 s and 0.41 s. The uncertainty in her distance measurement is 1 cm and theuncertainty in the timer is 0.01 s. What is the uncertainty in the value of g that Lucy calculates?

Select one:
a. at least 0.01 ms−2 and at most 0.03ms−2.
b. more than 0.03 ms−2but at most ms−2.
c. more than 0.1 ms−2 but at most 0.4 ms−2.
d. more than 0.4 ms−2 but at most 0.6 ms−2.
e. more than 0.6ms−2 but at most 2ms−2.http://asoeonline.edu.au/theme/image.php/essential/core/1427682940/i/grade_correct

Homework Equations


I am not sure about the equations to use, but I think that these ones might help:
GPE = mgh
F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



Average of time values = 0.45s
Uncertainty = 0.45s +/- 0.04 s

Distance uncertainty = 1m +/- 0.01mThis is as far as I go. How do I calculate the g values from here on?

Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The experiment involves finding an acceleration given a distance and a time. The initial velocity is zero. The final velocity is unknown.

Are you familiar with the SUVAT equations or similar? One of the standard equations is more useful than the others.
 
s = ut + (0.5*a)*(t^2)
0.99 = 1/2 * a * (0.41)^2
a = 11.78 m/s^2,

Which is way "off" the multiple choice answers
 
It looks to me like they want you to calculate the propagation of error, not necessarily the acceleration itself. There are some examples http://www.rit.edu/cos/uphysics/uncertainties/Uncertaintiespart2.html .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ruturaj Vaidya said:

Homework Statement


[/B]
Lucy is measuring the acceleration due to gravity in Melbourne by dropping a ball through a vertical distance 1.00 m and timing how long it takes.
The ball starts at rest, and Lucy times its fall four times. The results are: 0.47 s, 0.42 s, 0.48 s and 0.41 s. The uncertainty in her distance measurement is 1 cm and theuncertainty in the timer is 0.01 s. What is the uncertainty in the value of g that Lucy calculates?

Select one:
a. at least 0.01 ms−2 and at most 0.03ms−2.
b. more than 0.03 ms−2but at most ms−2.
c. more than 0.1 ms−2 but at most 0.4 ms−2.
d. more than 0.4 ms−2 but at most 0.6 ms−2.
e. more than 0.6ms−2 but at most 2ms−2.http://asoeonline.edu.au/theme/image.php/essential/core/1427682940/i/grade_correct

Homework Equations


I am not sure about the equations to use, but I think that these ones might help:
GPE = mgh
F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



Average of time values = 0.45s
Uncertainty = 0.45s +/- 0.04 s

Distance uncertainty = 1m +/- 0.01mThis is as far as I go. How do I calculate the g values from here on?

Thanks in advance :)

I might be tempted to give this question a miss. The variations in timings are much greater than could be caused by the uncertainties given. I wouldn't like to guess exactly what the question setter intended!

You may be expected to ignore the actual results, but that seems absurd to me.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top