How accurate is pulse width as a measure of response time for a pin photodiode?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the accuracy of pulse width as a measure of response time for a pin photodiode, specifically in the context of measuring a 10ns laser pulse using the s5973 photodiode. Participants explore factors affecting rise time and measurement techniques, as well as potential solutions to improve accuracy.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates a rise time of ~3ns for the s5973 photodiode and questions its effect on measuring a 10ns laser pulse.
  • Another participant explains that rise time is influenced by terminal capacitance, diffusion time, and carrier transit time, providing a link for further details.
  • A different participant notes that despite a calculated rise time of 0.35ns, their measurements show a broader pulse of 20ns when using the s5973 with specific equipment settings.
  • One participant questions the accuracy of the 10ns laser pulse measurement, suggesting it might actually be 20ns and recommends adjusting the reverse bias voltage on the APD and checking for stray capacitances.
  • Another participant describes "pulse width" as a crude measure of effective response time, suggesting that better accuracy can be achieved with good signal-to-noise ratio or synchronous detection techniques.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the accuracy of pulse width as a measure of response time, with some suggesting it is insufficient while others provide technical explanations for observed discrepancies. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to improve measurement accuracy.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific equipment and settings used in their measurements, but there is uncertainty regarding the actual pulse width of the laser input and the influence of various factors on rise time.

apuz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
For a pin photodiode, risetime=bandwidth/0.35
i get ~3ns for s5973
will it be affecting the measurement of 10ns laser pulse?
How can i reduce the rise time?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
apuz, Welcome to Physics Forums!

The response speed of a photodiode is a measure of the time required for the accumulated charge to become an external current and is generally expressed as the rise time or cut-off frequency. The rise time is the time required for the output signal to change from 10 % to 90 % of the peak output value and is determined by the following factors:

1) Terminal capacitance Ct and time constant t1 of load resistance RL
2) Diffusion time t2 of carriers generated outside the depletion layer
3) Carrier transit time t3 in the depletion layer

For exact details see section 3-2 of this application note:

http://sales.hamamatsu.com/assets/html/ssd/si-photodiode/index.htm

Hope this helps.
 
hi Bobby, thank you 4 your interest.

the link gives me a rise time of 0.35ns.Which seems not to create problems of broadening.But when we try to measure a 10ns pulse using this s5973, it is giving a broader pulse of 20ns. We did ensure the following:
1)1 Ghz oscilloscope
2)50 ohms coaxial cable
3)50 ohms dc coupling on oscilloscope
4)3.3 supply@ which terminal impedance is min

any help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
apuz, the first question I have is: How do you know your laser pulse input is 10nS? It may actually be 20 nS!

If you can be sure the input is 10 nS, you might try adjusting the reverse bias voltage on the APD. You might try to raise it up a bit while watching that pulse on the oscilloscope for any changes. Stray capacitances (unplanned) will spread out high risetime signals...check your circuit layout/groundplane. One more thing...you may get a new (different) s5973 and see what happens.

Sorry not much help. Last thought: contact Hammatsu applications engineers. They will be interested in solving this, I think.
 
the pulse width was measured by the people who installed it. They used a black box kind of thing and didn't reveal what it is.
 
"pulse width" is a very crude measure of effective response time - a bit like the Rayleigh Criterion for telescopes etc.. You can do much better than the 'rise time' accuracy if you have a good SNR or reduce your measurement bandwidth appropriately with synchronous detection etc.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K