How Accurate is the Formula for Arrow Velocity from a Bow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter npu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the formula for calculating the velocity of an arrow shot from a bow, specifically a leaf spring bow, while neglecting factors like air resistance and friction. The proposed formula incorporates variables such as the average force exerted by the spring, the weights of the arrow and spring, and their respective distances. The user expresses confidence in the results, noting that the velocity appears directly proportional to the mass and distance ratios of the arrow and spring. However, there is uncertainty about the formula's accuracy and a request for a derivation to verify its correctness. The importance of considering both the arrow's mass and the spring's mass distribution is also highlighted in the discussion.
npu
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Speed of an arrow from a bow (Latex format)

I am trying to determine the function for the velocity of an arrow out of a bow (leaf spring).
I am talking without considering factors such as air resistance and friction. I came up with:

<br /> V=\sqrt{ \frac {2F_{av}S_f10}{m_d+ \frac {1}{2}m_fR^{-1}}} <br />

S_f= Spring tip movement in meters;
S_d= Arrow's run in meters;
m_f= Spring weight in Kg;
m_d= Arrow weight in Kg;
F_{av}= Average force exerted by the spring along S_f in Newtons;
<br /> R=\frac {S_d}{S_f}<br />

Using this formula I got results which appear right:

Overall V appears to be directly proportional to arrow to spring ratios in mass and distance.

Still I am unsure about it. Is it right?
If so, is there a more elegant formulation?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
im not exactly an expert, but it seems to me like air ressistance and friction won't be flawing any simpler calcuations too greatly when your talking about the initial velocity, i wouldent even bother with them, mabye again that's because i can't exactly follow your equation, explain how you came up with it, i know i recoginse the format... honestly don't remember from what equation, but tell me how you ahve derived it and ill check over the math once I am sure there is no inherent flaw if you don't mind.
 
It would help if you provided a derivation of this proof. Can't help you otherwise.
 
This problem is being discussed in the Introductory Physics homework section.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=123957

Not only does one have to consider the mass of the arrow, but also the mass of the spring, which is distributed along the spring.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top