How are Coordinates Defined in General Relativity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdstokes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinates Gr
jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
In SR, coordinates are unambiguously defined with reference to a lattice of rigid steel rulers with synchronized clocks at each vertex.

How does the situation change in GR? Consider e.g. the Scharzschild metric

ds^2 = g(r) c^2 dt^2 - \frac{dr^2}{g(r)} - r^2(d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta d\varphi^2), \quad g(r) \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} 1 - \frac{2GM}{c^2r}.

This is the metric pertaining to an accelerated observer located at coordinates P= (r,\theta,\varphi) with respect to the source. The radius r is not the radius that an observer at P measures using a lattice of rigid steel rulers. How then is r to be defined?

I find the coordinate distance in the FRW metric easier to understand than in Scharzschild geometry since it is defined so that two freely falling observers hold a constant coordinate separation.

Here is a related question. Consider an ant sitting on the surface of a sphere. If the ant tries to establish a lattice of rigid rulers two things can happen. If the ant is aware of its surroundings it will find that the lattice extends tangentially off the sphere. If however, the ant is unaware of the surrounding space, then the lattice must curve with the surface of the sphere.

Doesn't one face a similar problem in constructing a coordinate lattice in curved spacetime? Is this how coordinates are defined in the Scharzschild metric with respect to a curved lattice of rigid steel rulers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From Wiki ( easier to copy it than to rewrite )

... the Schwarzschild radial coordinate does not accurately represent radial distances, i.e. distances taken along the spacelike geodesic congruence which arise as the integral curves of \partial_r. Rather, to find a suitable notion of 'spatial distance' between two of our nested spheres, we should integrate g(r)dr along some coordinate ray from the origin.

\Delta\rho = \int_{r_0}^{r_1} g(r) dr

The 'g(r)' is your g(r)-1. If you're aware of this, apologies for wasting time.

I was glad to refresh my memory ...

There's also a goodish thread on rulers in Schwarzschild spacetime recently, but I can't track it down.

M
 
Mentz114 said:
There's also a goodish thread on rulers in Schwarzschild spacetime recently, but I can't track it down.

Perhaps this one?

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=248015

Entry #5 seems like a good starting point.
 
There's no need to be sarcastic. If you find my reply inadequate or incorrect, you have the option of ignoring it, rather than lashing out.

M
 
That was not an attempt at sarcasm; I was just trying to be helpful.

I'm sorry it came across otherwise.
 
Mea culpa. I thought you'd posted the OP ! Stupid error. Apologies all round. The heat from my red face is melting the screen ...

M
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top