How Are Parametric Equations Derived in Complex Mathematical Problems?

GCT
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,745
Reaction score
0
I've recently attempted the following problem,

http://domino.research.ibm.com/Comm/wwwr_ponder.nsf/challenges/June2001.html

with the following solution

http://domino.research.ibm.com/Comm/wwwr_ponder.nsf/solutions/June2001.html


I've managed to form the meaningful derivatives (as they have listed on the solutions page) through a graphical analysis, but have no idea how they came up with the last two parametric equations. I wasn't even familiar with the term, and am getting myself up to date-any useful references...texts, internet site, specifically for this subject would be appreciated.

I would appreciate any comments regarding how they have derived the last two parametric equations on the solutions page, though it seems that the equation might have been computer derived.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It appears that they solved the system of DE's that they derived and plugged in the initial values. I only spent a few minutes on it, but unless there's some "special trick" they used to solve it, I'd imagine that they did in fact use a computer program.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top