How are particles assigned to 16bar representation in SO(10)?

In summary: Your Name]In summary, the assignment of SM particles and right-handed neutrinos to the \overline{16} representation in SO(10) models is determined by the embedding of the SM gauge group and its gauge symmetry breaking pattern. The derivation of fermion mass matrix relations and the VEVs of the involved Higgs fields can be found in various sources, such as the original paper by Georgi and Glashow and more recent papers. There are also textbooks and review articles available for further reading on the topic.
  • #1
Saschenka
2
0
Dear forum members!

Could someone tell me a reference, where it is accurately described how the SM particles + right-handed neutrino are assigned to the [itex]\overline{16}[/itex] representation in SO(10) models? I mean: Which component of the particle vector represents which particle?

Mainly I am interested in the derivation of the relations for all the fermion mass matrices, e.g. as they are stated (without proof) in eqn. 123 in hep-ph/9906433. Therefore I would also need the VEVs of the different Higgs fields involved. The reference noted there does not explain how the relations come about either.

Thank you all!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Dear forum members,

Thank you for your question. The assignment of SM particles and right-handed neutrinos to the \overline{16} representation in SO(10) models is based on the embedding of the SM gauge group into SO(10). This embedding is determined by the gauge symmetry breaking pattern, which is dictated by the VEVs of the Higgs fields involved.

The detailed derivation of the relations for fermion mass matrices can be found in various sources, such as the original paper by Georgi and Glashow (Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974)), as well as in more recent papers like hep-ph/9906433. The VEVs of the Higgs fields involved can also be found in these papers.

Additionally, there are several textbooks and review articles that discuss the SO(10) model and its particle content in detail, such as "Grand Unified Theories and Proton Decay" by Mohapatra and Pati, and "Grand Unified Theories: An Introduction" by Langacker.

I hope this helps answer your question. If you need further clarification or have any other questions, please do not hesitate to ask.
 

Related to How are particles assigned to 16bar representation in SO(10)?

What is SO(10)?

SO(10) is a mathematical group called the special orthogonal group in 10 dimensions. It is often used in particle physics to describe symmetries and relationships between different particles.

Why are particles assigned to 16bar representation in SO(10)?

In the Standard Model of particle physics, there are 16 fundamental particles that make up all matter. These particles can be organized into representations of SO(10) to show their relationships and symmetries.

How are particles assigned to 16bar representation in SO(10)?

The 16 fundamental particles in the Standard Model are divided into two groups: matter particles (quarks and leptons) and force-carrying particles (gauge bosons). Each group is assigned to a specific representation in SO(10), with the matter particles in the 16bar representation and the force-carrying particles in the 10 representation.

What is the significance of the 16bar representation in SO(10)?

The 16bar representation in SO(10) is significant because it is the smallest representation that contains all 16 fundamental particles in the Standard Model. This representation also exhibits important symmetries and relationships between the particles.

Is SO(10) the only group used to assign particles in particle physics?

No, there are other mathematical groups that are used to describe the relationships between particles in particle physics, such as SU(5) and SU(3). Each group has its own unique properties and is used to study different aspects of particle behavior.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
32
Views
617
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top