How are space and time related in the space-time ripple-nipple phenomenon?

AI Thread Summary
Space and time are intricately linked in the space-time ripple-nipple phenomenon, where each position in space corresponds to a specific time. The relationship can be estimated using the speed of light, allowing for calculations of distance based on the time it takes for light to travel to an object and back. The discussion highlights the complexity of photon emissions from an atom, suggesting that multiple photons can be viewed as multiple copies of the atom in different frames of reference. As the universe expands, the likelihood of observing the same photon diminishes over time, complicating distance measurements. Ultimately, the constant speed of light remains essential for determining astronomical distances in light-years.
deda
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
In the space - time ripple - nipple the space and the time are related i.e. for every position in one coordinate system there is corresponding time. I believe that even statically the space - time ripple - nipple is affected by contraction and dilation. But how are space and time actually related? The only possible way of estimating the time that corresponds to one known position is using the speed of the light. From the origin we must send a beam toward the object’s position, wait for it to return and divide twice the distance with c. We can also knowing the time necessary for the beam to reach the object and get beck to the origin estimate it’s corresponding position. But implementing this method always puts the photon in the origin of the system. Mainly the motive for this post is the possible confusion when one atom emits “several” photons in different directions. Actually, we cannot view the phenomenon from the atom’s rest frame because only the photons might be at the origin of the system. The fanny thing here is that we have many photons so how do we know which one to be at the origin. The answer might only be all the photons. This is what we have to do: make as many copies of the atom at its current position as many photons are present in the system. Group i - th copy of the atom with i - th photon (i different from 1) and shift the group until its photon’s position becomes same as the first photon’s position. This way we will put all the photons in one place - the origin of the system and will get many copies of the atom on different positions. Also the emission of these several photons in the atom’s rest frame can be understood as emission of several copies of the atom in the photon’s rest frame. The idea of several copies of one atom is somehow hard to digest, but being equivalent, is the idea about several photons in one system also hard to digest?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What is the chance that the photon we see looking into deep space on a cloudless night is the same original photon that started the journey billions of years ago?

At the younger age of the universe, When the radius is equal to 186,000 mi and assuming the observer is at the center, the chance of seeing the same photon is 2 seconds of time.

At radius 372,000 mi, the chance is 4 sec; at 558,000 mi, the chance is 6 sec., so on..

When the universe expands, the chance of seeing the same photon get less and less within the same time period.
 
Last edited:
The point is how do you measure the distance to those photon. The only thing you can be sure of is constant c. So you must send another photon from the origin and wait for it to back with the result.
 
It's not necessary to send another photon. Photon don't really interact with each other although interference patterns (can be seen with light of the same wavelength or frequency but out of phase) do arise. Photon interact with matter as describe in quantum electrodynamics (QED).

The constant c is used to measure distance in the astronomical sense of light-year.
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top