How BEC being described by the single-particle density matrix?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the one-body density matrix for Bose-Einstein Condensation (BEC) using the equation <\psi|\mathbf{\Psi(r)^\dagger\Psi(r')}|\psi>=N\int dx_2...dx_N~\psi^*(r,x_2,...,x_N)\psi(r',x_2',...,x_N'). The user, C.H., seeks guidance on manipulating the expression <\psi|\mathbf{\Psi(r)^\dagger\Psi(r')}|\psi> and handling the matrix element . The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the commutation properties of the Psi operators, specifically ##\{\mathbf{\Psi^+(x_1),\Psi(x_2)}\}=\delta(x_1-x_2##, to progress in this derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bose-Einstein Condensation (BEC)
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory concepts
  • Knowledge of single-particle density matrices
  • Comprehension of operator commutation relations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the one-body density matrix in BEC literature
  • Learn about the properties of quantum field operators
  • Explore the implications of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of the single-particle density matrix in many-body physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on Bose-Einstein Condensation and many-body physics, will benefit from this discussion.

csky
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

this is my first time being here. I am a beginner learning some introductions on Bose-Einstein Condensation (BEC) on my own. Often times in the literature (say, [1], [2] (p.409) ) it comes the one-body(single-particle) density matrix, as

[tex]<\psi|\mathbf{\Psi(r)^\dagger\Psi(r')}|\psi>=N\int dx_2...dx_N~\psi^*(r,x_2,...,x_N)\psi(r',x_2',...,x_N')[/tex]

I am not sure how to derive the above equation... My first step is to write [itex]<\psi|\mathbf{\Psi(r)^\dagger\Psi(r')}|\psi>[/itex] as

[tex] <\psi|\mathbf{\Psi(r)^\dagger\Psi(r')}|\psi>=\int dx_1...dx_N \int dx_1'...dx_N' \psi_t^*(x_1,...,x_N)<x_1,...,x_N|\mathbf{\Psi(r)^\dagger\Psi(r')}|x_1',...,x_N'>\psi_t(x_1,...,x_N)[/tex]

then I am not sure how to handle [itex]<x_1,...,x_N|\mathbf{\Psi(r)^\dagger\Psi(r')}|x_1',...,x_N'>[/itex]. Any ideas?

thanks in advance for help and comments,
C.H.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You probably know that e.g. ##\mathbf{\Psi(x_1)\Psi(x_2)}|0>=|x_1,x_2>## and so on for the position eigenstates of n particles in genera. Furthermore, you know the commutation properties of the Psi operators, ##\{\mathbf{\Psi^+(x_1),\Psi(x_2)}\}=\delta(x_1-x_2)##. This should be sufficient to work out the matrix element.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K