How can a black hole be created, any model

lalbatros
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
2
I would like to read an introduction text about how BH can be be formed, with a pure classical point of view (no quantum effects).

Is there some dynamic model of BH formation?
What are the main conclusions?
Is there a characteristic time for the appearance of a finite Scharchild radius? (as seen from far away from the BH)
Is there a known grow rate for some given initial mass density?

Or do these questions have little sense?

Any comment or refences welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Non-rotating spherically symmetric black hole collapse is discussed in the literature in http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v56/i5/p455_1 (the Oppenheimer-Snyder model, this is the Oppenheimer-Snyder paper).

This is probably not how real black holes form, because they rotate, and because they won't have perfect spherical symmetry.

The same material is in MTW pg 851 $32.4. Highlights are that the interior solution is just like a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmology, while the exterior solution is Schwarzschild. The proper time to reach the singularity is finite. There are some gif movies of this process and some discussion at http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/collapse.html#collapse

I recall some online homework sets that discussed this problem as well, but I couldn't find them.

Realistic collapse is a lot more complicated, and is still under study. Do a search for "Poisson-Israel" for some discussion.
 
This looked pretty good, Lalbatros:

http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/stellarevolution_deathhigh.html

I would recommend you watch the "movie" if you haven't already before you start reading the text. IMHO the rotating material looks awfully like water going down a plughole! I'll check out the one pervect posted (thanks pervect} and if it's different I'll see if I can dig up the one I was looking at.

Edit: the one I was looking at last week isn't the one pervect posted. The collapsing material was coloured brown, and the rotation flattened it and threw it around. But darn, I can't find it. I'm at work so I'll have to go now. This one didn't work too well on my PC:

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/universe/swift_multimedia.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
96
Views
6K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
542
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
37
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Back
Top