How can a car maintain traction while speeding around a banked curve?

  • Thread starter Thread starter funnyboy1000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Curve
AI Thread Summary
A car can maintain traction while speeding around a banked curve due to the banking angle, which provides a component of gravitational force that aids in centripetal acceleration. For a curve with a 200-meter radius banked for a speed of 60 km/h, the minimum coefficient of static friction required to prevent skidding at 90 km/h is calculated to be 0.18. If the road is wet, the car will skid if the wet friction coefficient is less than 0.18. Additionally, if the car slows down significantly on a wet surface, it could slide down the incline if the wet friction coefficient is below 0.14. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for safe driving on banked curves.
funnyboy1000
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A curve with a 200-m radius on a level road is banked at the correct angle for a speed of 60 km/h, i.e. a car traveling at this speed would remain on the road, even if the surface were frictionless.
a) If a car travels around this curve at a speed of 90 km/h, what is the minimum coefficient of static friction between the tires and the road that will prevent skidding?
b) If the surface were wet, would the speeding car in part (a) remain on the road?
c) If it was raining, and the car had to slow down to a crawl (for example, to safely pass a stranded vehicle), would it slide down the inclined roadway?

Homework Equations


Friction = force applied/(mass*gravity)
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I made a post earlier about another problem... I'm staring at these problems... and I have no idea how to solve them. I took notes on things relevant to these, but I have no idea how to apply them. In parentheses, mindless ranting [It might seem like I'm out just trying to get the easy answer to these.. but I really just need some kind of hint or something. I have no idea how to apply the relevant equations to the problem. Once again i would appreciate some kind of explanation as to how these kinds of problems work, so I can attempt to solve these kinds of problems. I'm better at math than physics, because I really am bad at application of equations.] Mainly, I don't understand how you can drive along a curve without any friction. I could understand that if there were something on the sides guiding you on the curve, but I think you would drift out of the curve if there were no friction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To cause a body to travel in a circle, you need a force acting towards the centre of that circular path. This force can (i) come from friction with the roadway, or (ii) from a rope anchored to a pole at the centre of the circle, or (iii) by banking the roadway as you see in a velodrome. When the roadway is banked, a component of the weight of the body tends to cause the body to slide towards the centre of the circular path. In a velodrome, there's an optimal speed where the cyclist will travel in a level circle; slower than this it will tend to slide down towards the centre; much faster than optimal and the bicycle would tend to rise up the slope. Friction of tyres with the track allows the cyclist to make corrections and travel a little faster or slower than optimal for the slope of that track.
 
Hi,

An interesting problem!

When going through a curve of radius r with speed v_1, you have a centripetal acceleration of v_1^2/r. Hence, according to Newton's law, you need a centripetal force of m v_1^2/r, where m is the mass of the car (this will cancel out later).

Now, suppose that the road exerts a normal force F_n on the car. Since there is no vertical acceleration, the vertical component of the normal force balances the weight of the car: F_n \cos(\theta) = m g, where \theta is the angle of the banking slope and g is the acceleration of gravity. The horizontal component F_n \sin(\theta) of the normal force provides the centripetal force, and is equal to m v_1^2/r where v_1 is the "normal" speed of 60 km/h. Incidentally, it follows that the banking slope \theta is given by \tan(\theta)=\frac{v_1^2}{r g}
so that, with v_1= 60 km/h = 16.67 m/s, r= 200 m, and g=9.8 m/s^2, I obtain a slope of 8.1 degrees, or 14%, which sounds plausible.

Continuing to question (a), suppose the car is going v_2 = 90 km/h instead of 60 km/h. This requires m(v_2^2-v_1^2)/r extra centripetal force, which must be provided by the horizontal component of the friction force F_f on the tires, which is equal to F_f\cos(\theta). The friction force is given by F_f = \mu F_n, where \mu is the coefficient of static friction. Using my previously obtained result F_n = m g / \cos(\theta), I find F_f cos(\theta) = \mu m g. Equating this to the required extra centripetal force and solving for \mu, I obtain \mu=\frac{v_2^2-v_1^2}{r g}. With v_2 = 90 km/h = 25 m/s and the parameters above, I obtain \mu = 0.18.

As for question (b), my answer would be that this depends on the value of the static friction coefficient when it is wet, \mu_{wet}. If \mu_{wet}<0.18 the car will skid, otherwise not.

As for (c), the requirement here is that the horizontal component of the normal force, F_n \cos(\theta), is smaller than the horizontal component of the friction force, F_f \sin(\theta). Filling in F_f = \mu_{wet} F_n and some manipulation yields the requirement \tan(\theta) < \mu_{wet} which in view of the parameters given means that we must have \mu_{wet}>0.14.

I hope this helps!

Cheers,
Kurt
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top