How Can a Single Component Reproduce Billions of Sounds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physior
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sound
AI Thread Summary
Sound production relies on the ability of speakers to reproduce complex waveforms through vibration. A single speaker can create billions of sounds by generating composite waveforms, which are the result of combining multiple sound frequencies. The speaker diaphragm moves in response to electrical signals, accurately matching the waveform of the desired sound. This process allows the speaker to produce sounds like a lion's roar and a bird's chirp simultaneously, even though it operates as a single source. Understanding this concept involves recognizing the relationship between time and frequency domains in sound analysis.
physior
Messages
182
Reaction score
1
hello!

can you explain me please in few simple words, how are we capable to produce sound?

in nature, a great variety of different things produces different sounds

from the wind on the leaves of the trees, to the huma larynx, a complex organ with numerous muscles

yet, all of these sounds, can be produced from your speakers

what exactly component is able to produce all these billions of sounds?

is it a membrane that gets hitted with different areas of it? or specific properties electricity runs through it?

but how can ALL sounds be produced from that single component?

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at this diagram for a second.
adding_sines_figure4.1.jpg

Pretend the top left wave is a lion's roar, and the bottom left wave is a bird's chirp.

These two waves add to each other, and are equivalent to the right wave.

If a speaker can accurately reproduce the right wave, we will hear a lion's roar and a bird's chirp at the same time.
You can add as many waves together as you want. (such as a 100 piece symphony)

Here are some more examples of additive wave synthesis:
Diag_AdditiveSynthesis.png


additivesynthesis.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith
DaveC426913 said:
If a speaker can accurately reproduce the right wave, we will hear a lion's roar and a bird's chirp at the same time.
You can add as many waves together as you want. (such as a 100 piece symphony)

Here are some more examples

how can a speaker reproduce so many (billions) of different waves? (not at the same time)
 
physior said:
how can a speaker reproduce so many (billions) of different waves? (not at the same time)

As long as the speaker can vibrate at a frequency higher than the bird's chirp (maybe 5,000Hz), the speaker can represent that sound. (though if it needs to represent rich sounds faithfully, it will need to be able to vibrate higher)

It simply vibrates to exactly match the waveform on the right. How it does so is directly a result of how much voltage it is given over time.
So, that right waveform is an actual graph of the voltage passed to the speaker magnet over time.
It also happens to be an actual graph of the position of the speaker diaphragm (in very small distance units) as it moves in and out, making sound.
 
Last edited:
physior said:
how can a speaker reproduce so many (billions) of different waves? (not at the same time)
I think you are missing the point that the speaker doesn't vibrate at all those different frequencies, it vibrates at a COMPOSITE frequency and produces exactly the same thing that you ear gets when it is listening to all those things happening at the same time.

To expand: The human ear hears a lion roar and a bird chirping at the same time. These events separately cause sound waves but when they impinge on the ear, what they create is a composite waveform. You only have one ear drum on each side after all. The speaker just produces that composite waveform from a single source rather than from multiple sources, but it is still one waveform, it just has the composite characteristics of multiple waveforms.

When you study Fourier Analysis, you'll learn more about this.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
physior said:
how can a speaker reproduce so many (billions) of different waves? (not at the same time)
The sound that a microphone picks up is just a variation of pressure. This is a single quantity, varying in time which, to suit Engineers and Scientists, can be analysed in terms of the sum of many pure sinusoids at different frequencies. A loudspeaker, fed with exactly the same signal that the microphone picks up, will produce the identical sound by making the air move in exactly the same way. It is only necessary that the speaker cone can be made to move as required. It has to be light and rigid enough and to be driven with the appropriate force (from the coil and the magnet). It doesn't 'know' that it is emitting all those separate waves because that's just a way of looking at it.
The Time Domain and the Frequency Domain are just two ways of describing the same complex signal.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top