How Can a Single Radio Telescope Distinguish Between Point and Extended Sources?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mordeth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Source
AI Thread Summary
To distinguish between point and extended radio sources using a single radio telescope, the key lies in analyzing the data over time rather than relying on a single observation. A point source appears concentrated in one pixel, while an extended source will show variation as the telescope scans different areas. By observing the source at multiple points in time, one can assess its size based on how the signal spreads across the dish. This method assumes the source remains relatively constant during observations. Ultimately, the ability to differentiate relies on temporal scanning and the analysis of signal distribution.
mordeth
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If you were using a single radio telescope (not an interferometer) how could you tell whether a radio source was a point source or extended source?

I have searched the internet far and wide for many hours trying to answer this - I know what the difference between a point source and extended source is, but I'm not sure whether the question is asking for a simple or technical explanation. Is it something to do with the radio telescope data or how the radiation from the source is spread out on the dish when its received?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I assume you mean the usual in-effect single-pixel radio telescope at a single point in time. Then it is pretty much impossible to tell the difference, I think. The usual method then is to look at different points at different times. i.e. scan out the image over time. You can then detect its size, assuming its pretty much a constant source and really bigger than one pixel.

Jim Graber
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top