How can a tiny neutrino produce massive W+ and electron?

a dull boy
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
A charged lepton can absorb a W+ boson and be converted into a neutrino, and visa versa. The neutrino has such small rest mass, how can it produce these large particles/be produced by them?
 
  • Like
Likes Lobzang Dojay
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy of the neutrino matters more than its rest mass. Consider the reaction

##\bar \nu_e + p \to e^+ + n##

that is: an electron-antineutrino hits a proton and in the process of the collision the proton turns into a neutron and the antineutrino turns into a positron. This happens via the exchange of a W boson between the antineutrino and the proton.

You are right that a lepton like a positron is much heavier than a neutrino. Also, a neutron is heavier than a proton. The extra rest-mass energy is supplied by the kinetic energy of the initial particles. Therefore this reaction can only happen if the antineutrino has enough kinetic energy to supply the missing rest-mass energy needed to make the final-state particles.
 
  • Like
Likes Lobzang Dojay and Tarlin
The W+ boson is often a virtual particle - "its energy" (note: this is not really a well-defined value here) can be below the W mass.
To produce positrons or other reaction products, it needs enough kinetic energy.
 
Dear mfb and The Duck-
Thanks very much for your answers - I understand!
Mark
 
Also a single neutrino (alone), cannot decay to another particle because of energy conservation...
 
The requirement for neutrinos to have extra kinetic energy (or be at a higher energy level) is one of the reasons they rarely experience a charged current of the weak force, despite there being so many of them in existence.

neutrino_scattering.png
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top