How Can AC Circuits Be Analyzed Using Ammeters and Voltmeters?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing AC circuits using ammeters and voltmeters, focusing on a specific circuit configuration with given resistances and reactances. Participants explore the calculation of current and the theoretical understanding of complex admittance.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • One participant attempts to calculate the current through different branches of the circuit using complex numbers and questions where their calculations diverge from the expected result. Another participant raises a theoretical question about the sign of susceptance in complex admittance and its physical implications.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress in resolving the first problem, while the second question remains open for exploration. There is an ongoing examination of the relationship between physical parameters and their mathematical representations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with specific values for resistances and reactances, and there is a mention of attachments that may contain circuit diagrams relevant to the discussion. Theoretical considerations about inductive and capacitive reactance are also being discussed.

R A V E N
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In circuit given in attachment,find the value which is showed on ammeter A,if voltmeter is showing [tex]50\;V[/tex].

Values are [tex]R=R_2=X_L=X_C=10\;\Omega[/tex] and [tex]R_1=5\;\Omega[/tex].

The Attempt at a Solution


First I calculate current thought branch with [tex]R_2[/tex] and [tex]X_C[/tex]:

[tex]\underline{I}_2=\frac{\underline{U}}{-jX_C}=j5\;A[/tex]

then knowing that potential difference at the ends of branches(one with [tex]R_2[/tex] and
[tex]X_C[/tex] and the other with [tex]R_1[/tex] and [tex]X_L[/tex]) is the same,I proceed:

[tex]\underline{U}_1=\underline{U}_2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\underline{I}_1}{R_1+jX_L}=\frac{\underline{I}_2}{R_2-jX_C}[/tex]

[tex]\underline{I}_1=\frac{R_1+jX_L}{R_2-jX_C}\underline{I}_2=(-3.75-j1.25)\;A[/tex]

Overall current [tex]\underline{I}[/tex] in circuit is the sum of two currents from two branches,so:

[tex]\underline{I}=\underline{I_1}+\underline{I_2}=(-3.75+j3.75)\;A[/tex]

Module of this value is value showed on ammeter:

[tex]|\underline{I}|=5.303\;A[/tex]

However,correct solution is:

[tex]3\sqrt{5}\;A\approx6.708\;A[/tex]

Where is the mistake?
 

Attachments

  • circuit.gif
    circuit.gif
    3.7 KB · Views: 515
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The second question is a theoretical one.Suppose that we have a simple system like one illustrated in attachment.

If we need to find complex admittance of that system,we can write:

[tex]\underline{Y}=G+jB=\frac{1}{\underline{Z}}=\frac{1}{R+jX_L}\cdot\frac{R-jX_L}{R-jX_L}=\frac{R-jX_L}{R^2+X_L^2}=\frac{R}{R^2+X_L^2}+j\frac{-X_L}{R^2+X_L^2}[/tex]

from where we can see that it is [tex]B=\frac{-X_L}{R^2+X_L^2}[/tex],althought it is [tex]B=\frac{X_L}{R^2+X_L^2}[/tex].

Why is this "-" just neglected,what is physical explanation of that?

Or it is just hardcore mathematical laws against imperfect physical reality?
 

Attachments

  • system.gif
    system.gif
    968 bytes · Views: 465
OK,I managed to resolve first problem,but what about second one?
 
Probably the explanation is that while one physical parameter is rising(susceptance [tex]B[/tex]),the other is lowering(inductive reactance [tex]X_L[/tex]) and vice-versa,like it is in Faraday`s law of induction:

[tex]e=-\frac{d\phi}{dt}[/tex]

the magnetic field which is produced by induced current(which is in turn produced by induced electromotive force [tex]e[/tex]) is in oposition with the change of outer flux [tex]\phi[/tex](sorry if my technical english sounds a bit clumsy).

But what if there is capacitor instead of inductor?
In that case there is no confusion like this.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K