News How can an international automatic missile system prevent nuclear war?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FZ+
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ebola Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the perceived threat of nuclear conflict stemming from the instability of world leaders who control nuclear arsenals. The current doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (M.A.D.) is seen as an inadequate safeguard, especially as advancements in weaponry make strikes more precise and less damaging to the aggressor. A radical proposal suggests implementing an automatic missile defense system targeting leaders who initiate nuclear strikes, effectively deterring such actions by making them suicidal. This system would also extend to prevent attacks on civilian targets and could involve extreme measures against political leaders to ensure compliance. Contrasting views emerge, with one participant arguing that nuclear war is inevitable and advocating for a preemptive strike to understand the realities of nuclear conflict. The conversation takes a humorous turn, with references to absurd proposals and the idea of being "above the law." Overall, the thread highlights deep concerns about nuclear safety and governance, alongside dark humor and extreme suggestions for deterrence.
FZ+
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
3
(This is partially a joke. But if any government officials are reading, consider this a freebie from the famous FZ one-man thinktank. :smile:)

Ok people, take notes now.

The primary threat from nuclear conflict is due to the instability of world leaders, who command these arsenals. At any moment, each one can in a moment of megalomania launch a strike to decimate entire cities. The primary defense system at present is a policy of M.A.D., and futuretech initiatives involving missile defense programs are unlikely to be very reliable as a basis of world peace. As weapons become cleaner and more precise, and the ability to deliver mass destruction with minimum damage to self and allies improves, this vital safeguard is being destroyed. But due to the need for self-protection, securing global disarmament is unlikely.

Hence proposal:

Install an international automatic system of guided missiles targeted at all world officials, allied or enemy. All nations that are developing nuclear arms, or have them already must sign up or face instant war from signed up nations. The system works by launching an immediate strike at any official that launches a nuke, with or without provokation. This serves as an effective deterrent to all leaders who would consider atomic bombs acceptable policy, by making any such action literal suicide. Hence this reserves missiles as only weapons of last resort.

Advantages:
Cheap.
Reliable - politicians' cowardice is ALWAYS reliable.
Little diplomatic implications.
No accusation bias etc.
Few loopholes.

This system can be extended to automatically interprete orders to bomb civilian targets etc. As further protection, the field of the automatic response can be extended to include lower rank ministers as well. Possibilities involve:

Coating Big Red Button with cyanide
Impregnating firing code slips with ebola
Removing blast doors and other protective systems from nuclear silos.
Gluing nuclear bombs to the aircraft they are arming.
Putting C4 into the bomb-authorisation suitcase carried by the head of state.
Converting nuclear missiles into (rather heavy) nuclear GRENADES.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like Star Wars...
 
Except we are aiming at the a$$holes in charge, not the missiles themselves.
 
To save valuable propellant how about if the nukes are made very small and implanted into the colons of all the political leaders, then remotely detonated as needed?
 
Originally posted by FZ+
Except we are aiming at the a$$holes in charge, not the missiles themselves.

Sure, FZ+, except, with you calling the shots on this proposal... wouldn't that make you one of the people in charge?

(snicker)
 
Hey, somebody has to be above the law. It might as well be me.

BH: I love it. Then, when we say their ass is on the line, we really mean it...
 
Originally posted by FZ+
Hey, somebody has to be above the law. It might as well be me.
Communist
 
I think you got it wrong.

You guys spend your life trying to prevent nuclear war. Every day one more crazy moron gets a few. Nuclear war is inevitable.

Instead of trying to prevent it, we should wage it.

We should hit first, hit hard, and freak everybody into oblivion.

Only after a few salvo's will we truly understand what real nuclear war is, how to fight it, and most importantly, how to survive it. Only then will it become...well...conventional.


Pandora's box will never, ever, ever, remain unopened. Best we open it now, take our chances, and LEARN.
 
And as my second proposal, I advise we all set Ganshauk's house to calibrate our weapons. Maybe he'll tell us how to surivive a nuclear explosion. :wink:
 
  • #10
Originally posted by FZ+
And as my second proposal, I advise we all set Ganshauk's house to calibrate our weapons. Maybe he'll tell us how to surivive a nuclear explosion. :wink:

FZ+, I'm working on a proposal that has reward points for not blowing everyone to kingdom gone... but, I would think that everyone could see the inherent rewards in that sort of behaviour anyway [zz)]
 
  • #11
Hey isn't this one of those 'this is what I'd do if I were God' proposals?
 
  • #12
Originally posted by schwarzchildradius
Hey isn't this one of those 'this is what I'd do if I were God' proposals?

Yeah! That's it!... "Bruce the Almighty". A must see!
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Back
Top