How can Arctan and ln be used to simplify the integral of (x+1)/(x^2+4x+5)?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TheTimeTraveler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral ∫(x+1)/(x^2 + 4x + 5) dx can be simplified using the techniques of integration involving Arctan and natural logarithm (ln). The solution involves rewriting the integral as 1/2∫(2x+2)/(x^2+4x+5) dx, which can be further decomposed into two parts: 1/2∫(2x+4)/(x^2+4x+5) dx and 1/2∫(-2)/(1+(x+2)^2) dx. The final result is expressed as [1/2 ln |(x^2+4x+5)|] - arctan(x+2) plus the constant of integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with the properties of natural logarithms (ln)
  • Knowledge of the Arctan function and its integration
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions for simplification
NEXT STEPS
  • Study techniques for integrating rational functions
  • Learn about the properties and applications of the Arctan function in calculus
  • Explore the use of substitution methods in integral calculus
  • Review the concept of the constant of integration in indefinite integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focused on calculus, as well as professionals seeking to enhance their integration techniques using logarithmic and trigonometric functions.

TheTimeTraveler
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Member warned about posting homework questions in a technical forum section
∫(x+1)/(x^2 + 4x +5) dx
Anyone can help me doing it using Arctan and ln
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's first hear out your own idea to solve this problem? What strategy you have in mind?
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Let's first hear out your own idea to solve this problem? What strategy you have in mind?
∫(x+1)/(x^2+4x+5) dx = 1/2∫ (2x+2)/(x^2+4x+5) dx = 1/2∫(2x+4)/(x^2+4x+5) dx + 1/2∫(-2)/(1+(x+2)^2) dx
[1/2 ln l(x^2+4x+5)l ] - arctan(x+2)
SO??
 
Don't forget the "constant of integration".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheTimeTraveler
HallsofIvy said:
Don't forget the "constant of integration".
Thaanks
 
Try re-writing the original expression into something more manageable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K