How Can Degenerate Perturbation Theory Help Identify Zero Order Eigenstates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hermitian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perturbation
hermitian
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I know that for degenerate states, we need to apply degenerate perturbation theory by looking at the perturbative hamiltonian in the subspace of the degenerate states.

What then if the states still degenerate after we cast them the generate subspace. Is there a way to find the zero order 'good' eigenstate?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I borrow this thread to ask a question that is similar to this one.
What does it mean that an operator has a degenarate spectrum and how can we see that if the operator is represented by a matrix. Thanx a lot and I hope I'm not stepping on anybodys toe by using this thread.
 
Welcome to the forum, hermitian!

I believe you can use any basis you like in the subspace if the perturbation does not lift the degeneracy.

A "degenerate spectrum" means that at least one eigenvalue occurs more than once. This would then also be true of the matrix representing the operator.
 
Avodyne said:
Welcome to the forum, hermitian!

I believe you can use any basis you like in the subspace if the perturbation does not lift the degeneracy.

A "degenerate spectrum" means that at least one eigenvalue occurs more than once. This would then also be true of the matrix representing the operator.

thnx that helped alot. Let me see if I got this right: Eigenvalues are the observables and the eigenvectors are the states of the system. what would degenerate spectrum mean physically.

thnx
 
It would mean that knowing the eigenvalue is not sufficient information to determine the state.
 
thanks Avodyne,

i spend sometime to convince myself that I can use any basis I like in the degenerate subspace...
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top