How can galxies and dwarf galaxies be made of regular AND dark matter?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the coexistence of regular and dark matter in galaxies, questioning how dwarf galaxies can be predominantly dark matter if it doesn't interact with light or regular matter. Participants express confusion about the role of dark matter, suggesting it may be a "scapegoat" for gaps in understanding. They highlight that dark matter's gravitational effects are the primary evidence for its existence, influencing galaxy rotation, cluster dynamics, and cosmic microwave background data. The conversation also touches on how early universe perturbations in dark matter density led to the formation of structures that regular matter later adhered to. Overall, the belief in dark matter's necessity for galaxy formation is widely accepted among experts.
fellupahill
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
If dark matter is actually there and not just some flaw in our understanding or mathematics then how can galaxies be made of both and not just one or the other. If dark matter doesn't interact with anything else like light then how can a dwarf galaxy be made of "mostly dark matter"?I know its probably just a misunderstanding of mine, but right now it really seems like dark matter is a scape goat. Do a lot of experts share this hypothesis?
What are some other reasons why physicists believe dark matter is there, other than its gravitational effects on the movement of galaxies? Or is that pretty much it? (I understand this is a big deal, ha) and finally, what are the leading theories that explain dark matter and which do you support?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Both matter and dark matter interact through gravity, but neither interact with each other in any other way. So dark matter is simply there in space like normal matter is.
 
but proportional enough to form almost perfect circles around galaxies? wouldn't they just form their own random clumps? I mean they are stronger? Does that mean its strong enough so almost all matter is inside dark matter? But not strong enough to cause any negative effects? or whatever the technical term in physics is for "negative effects" is.

Its obvious that I am missing something in my understanding. Elighten? :)
 
It is thought that in the early universe small perturbation of dark matter density causes clumps to eventually form, and this is the scaffolds that visible matter adheres to later on. See e.g. this.

Here are some good readings about properties of dark matter and why most experts think they are needed [instead of say, modified gravity]. A quick answer is dark matter explanation fits well not just for galaxies rotation curve, galaxy cluster, gravitational lensing, but also the cosmic microwave background data.

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2009/10/what_is_dark_matter.php

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2011/10/the_status_of_dark_matter.php

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2011/10/a_new_test_of_dark_matter_vs_m.php

Dark Matter: Just Fine, Thanks.
 
That post clarified things perfectly for me. Is this uniformly believed? That dark matter was essential for galaxy formation? It makes perfect sense.

In science, even when you're convinced that you know the right answer, you keep testing your understanding in new ways.
-ethan siegel
I like that perfect quote.

edit
perfect. perfection. post perfection. infinite perfection. lol
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top