How can genes for cells change?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the changes in genes and gene expression observed in astronaut Scott Kelly after a year spent in microgravity. Participants explore the implications of these changes, particularly in relation to epigenetics and telomere length, and whether these changes are permanent or reversible.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether Scott Kelly's genes have changed in new cells, suggesting that the old genes may die out and be replaced by new ones.
  • Another participant asserts that it is not the genes themselves that changed, but rather their expression, which can be modified in response to different conditions.
  • Epigenetics is introduced as a relevant field, focusing on how gene expression can be turned on or off, or adjusted in intensity.
  • A later reply reiterates the point about gene expression changes and highlights that 7% of these changes had not returned to normal after Kelly's return to Earth.
  • Discussion also touches on the unexpected finding that Scott Kelly's telomeres were longer than his twin brother Mark's during his time in space, with ongoing research into how space living may affect telomere length.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the changes observed are due to alterations in gene expression or actual changes in the genes themselves. There is no consensus on the permanence of these changes or their implications.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about gene expression changes and telomere length are based on specific studies, but the discussion does not resolve the broader implications or mechanisms behind these observations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying genetics, epigenetics, space biology, or anyone curious about the effects of microgravity on human physiology.

swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
I was reading about astronaut Scott Kelly's genes having "permanently" changed after a year in 0-G (the key is not that his capsule was in space, but rather that he was at 0-G, but I digress ...) Is it supposed to mean that genes have changed in new cells being born, eventually taking over as the cells with the old genes have died out? And then the genes changed back in the same process?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
His genes did not change. Instead, it was their expression that changed. Cells contain ways to modify the expression of different genes, which enables them to better respond to changing conditions. NASA found that Scott Kelly had significant changes in gene expression thanks to his stint in space, and that 7% of this altered gene expression still had yet to return to normal.

See here: https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/15/...y-dna-scott-kelly-international-space-station
 
Drakkith said:
His genes did not change. Instead, it was their expression that changed. Cells contain ways to modify the expression of different genes, which enables them to better respond to changing conditions. NASA found that Scott Kelly had significant changes in gene expression thanks to his stint in space, and that 7% of this altered gene expression still had yet to return to normal.

See here: https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/15/...y-dna-scott-kelly-international-space-station
Thanks for the link. I hope this effect stimulates a lot more research:

'Upon Scott’s return to Earth, researchers found that his telomeres — the protective caps on the end of DNA strands — were unexpectedly longer than Mark’s telomeres. Scott’s telomeres have since returned to the lengths they were before the ISS mission, but researchers are studying the telomeres of other astronauts to figure how living in space may have caused the caps to grow.'

A colleague of mine studies telomeres:

https://www.csuohio.edu/grhd/faculty/bibo-li
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K