I How can gravity hold galaxy groups togehter?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores how gravity can hold galaxy groups together despite the expansion of space, specifically addressing two galaxies at rest with a distance of 1 Mpc between them. The gravitational force calculated is 2.67 ∙ 10^30 N, resulting in a minuscule acceleration of 4.45 ∙ 10^-13 m/s². The escape velocity for the galaxies is determined to be 160 km/s, indicating they remain gravitationally bound as long as their velocity is below this threshold. The conversation highlights the misconception of comparing gravitational force directly with the expansion velocity of space, emphasizing the importance of understanding gravitational potential and kinetic energy. Overall, the interplay of gravity and cosmic expansion presents a complex but fascinating aspect of cosmology.
Tryggvas
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Thought experiment: Assume two galaxies in a galaxy group, initially at rest (with respect to one another). The distance between the centers of the galaxies is r = 1 Mpc.

The total mass of each galaxy is mg = 6 ∙ 1042 kg (including dark matter). This is ≈ 3 ∙ 1012 solar masses.

The gravitational pull between the galaxies will be F= G ∙ mg2 /r2 = 2.67 ∙ 1030 N, and the corresponding acceleration will be a = F/mg = 4.45 ∙ 10-13 m/s only. (Using G= 6.67 ∙ 10-11 m3kg-1s-2).

How can this tiny force withstand the expansion of space (which at this distance is ≈ 70 km/s)?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The timescale is millions to billions of years, over such a timescale even small acceleration values matter. The gravitational potential is 8*1052 J, giving the galaxies an escape velocity of 160 km/s. If they are slower than that, they are gravitationally bound.
 
Put your example in perspective, make predictions and explain how they differ from mainstream predictions - along with the math that supports your predictions.
 
Tryggvas said:
How can this tiny force withstand the expansion of space (which at this distance is ≈ 70 km/s)?

Notice that the latter is a speed, not an acceleration or a force. You cannot directly compare them in this manner.
 
Tryggvas said:
Thought experiment: Assume two galaxies in a galaxy group, initially at rest (with respect to one another). The distance between the centers of the galaxies is r = 1 Mpc.

The total mass of each galaxy is mg = 6 ∙ 1042 kg (including dark matter). This is ≈ 3 ∙ 1012 solar masses.

The gravitational pull between the galaxies will be F= G ∙ mg2 /r2 = 2.67 ∙ 1030 N, and the corresponding acceleration will be a = F/mg = 4.45 ∙ 10-13 m/s only. (Using G= 6.67 ∙ 10-11 m3kg-1s-2).

How can this tiny force withstand the expansion of space (which at this distance is ≈ 70 km/s)?
Assuming both galaxies are initially at rest with respect to the Hubble flow, the analogous situation here is that of the standard projectile motion problem in one dimension. Construct the equation with acceleration given by the gravitational attraction, initial distance equal to 1 Mpc, and initial velocity equal to 70 km/s (because that's essentially the meaning of the Hubble constant in the absence of dark energy, which we can assume here for simplicity).
Since acceleration is changing, this will require a bit more calculus than it would for a constant case (but then again, this is an 'I' thread).

Alternatively, write kinetic and potential energy equations using these values, and see if the system is gravitationally bound (Ek<Ep).*This looks like the often made mistake of thinking of the standard (no dark energy) expansion as 'pushing' galaxies apart, whereas it should be thought of as simple inertial motion, with some initially imparted velocity and varying gravitational acceleration.

*I can see mfb already calculated the required escape velocity, corresponding to the case Ek=Ep. You can see that it is higher than 70km/s.
 
Thank you very much for your explanations and clarifications. I fully understand that you cannot compare an acceleration or force with a velocity. I just thought it was strange that the tiny gravitational pull could have such a strong effect as to keep galaxy groups together, and suspected that I had made some mistake in my calculations. I had not thought of calculating the escape velocity, when you do that it is easier to understand.

Cosmology and gravity is very exciting! I hope that we will get an explanation of the “dark” components of our universe during my lifetime.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb and Drakkith
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top