How can I apply Wien's and Stefan's laws to solve these astronomy questions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kylewoodloveast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy General
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on applying Wien's and Stefan's laws to various astronomy problems, with the user seeking guidance on how to approach the questions rather than just answers. Key points include the need to use the equation c = fλ for calculating frequency, and understanding that Wien's law allows for temperature comparison without needing absolute values. The user is advised that Stefan's law requires knowing the temperature to determine energy output per unit area. Additionally, the importance of considering body surface area when calculating energy radiation is emphasized. Overall, the conversation highlights the necessity of grasping fundamental concepts in physics to solve these astronomy-related questions.
kylewoodloveast
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am having a hard time with these astronomy questions. Our teacher gives us no help and I am lost with this stuff. If anybody could help me out not just with the answer but on How to do it I would be most appreciative.

What would be the frequency of an electromagnetic wave having a wavelength of 1.37 Earth's diameter (12,800 km) to the nearest Hz?

The blackbody emission spectrum of one object peaks in the ultraviolet region of the spectrum at 185 nm. A second object's spectrum peaks in the red region at 650 nm. To two decimal places, according to Wien's law, how many times hotter is it?

To one decimal place, in the previous problem, according to Stefan's law, how many times more energy per unit area does the hotter body radiate?

If your body surface area is 1.98 m2, to the nearest watt, how much energy do you radiate to your environment per second?

To the nearest hundredth of a micron, at what wavelength does a protostar with a temperature of 979 K radiate most strongly?

Radiation from an approaching nearby star is observed to be reduced in wavelength (after correcting for Earth's orbital motion) by a factor of 0.999926. To the nearest tenth of a km/s, what is the radial velocity of the star relative to the Sun?

Imagine you are observing a spacecraft orbiting a distant planet in an orbit with a radius of 100,000 km. You happen to be located in the plane of the spacecraft 's orbit. You find that the spacecraft 's radio signal varies periodically in wavelength between 3 + and - 0.000023 meters. Assuming the radio is broadcasting at constant frequency, to the nearest tenth of a MHz, what is that frequency?

In the previous problem, what is the mass of the planet? Enter the answer in the form n.nneyy, which is "computer speak" for n.nn x 10yy, that is, 5.37 x 1020 should be entered as 5.37e20.




If you can just help on one that would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, kyle. Note that our forum rules prevent us from ever handing out solutions to homework questions, and from giving help before we have seen some effort from the student. So, please tell us what you think about any of these questions. Do you have any formulae you know, or any way in which you think you can proceed on any of the questions?
 
well for the first question i know frequency=1/period...which doesn't make any sense to me.

on the 2nd i know that the ultraviolet is hotter but i don't how to find the temperature to put it into wiens formula

the next problem assumes i got the previous question right. i didn't

with the next problem I can not find a formula to find out the watt's a human body gives off. do i have to know the temp of my body before knowing the energy it emits?

ps. i am a music ed major. this is my one science that i am required. help
 
Note: moved from Astronomy to HW/coursework under Other Sciences. - MIH
 
For the first question, the equation you've given is not going to help. You will need to use c = f\lambda which relates the wave speed, c, with its frequency, f, and the wavelength lambda.

For the second, You do not need to know T. You are just comparing the temperature for different peak wavelengths. Use Wien's law to work out the temperature then see if you can work out which one is greater than the other by a particular factor.

For the third. Yes you will have to have worked out the temperature to compare the two valuse from Stefan's law.

You would probably use stefans law again for the fourth question with the average human body temperature. Rememberit gives you watts per unit area so you'll have to be careful. Consider why they give you the surface area of a human body.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top