How can I calculate a rotation using geometric algebra?

JonnyMaddox
Messages
74
Reaction score
1
Hi, I want to calculate a rotation of a vector GA style with this formula e^{-B \frac{\pi}{2}}(2e_{1}+3e_{2}+e_{3})e^{B\frac{\pi}{2}}. Now since no book/pdf on GA exists where a calculation is explicitly done with numbers, I wounder how to calculate this. Should I substitude e^{-B \frac{\pi}{2}}=cos (\frac{\pi}{2})-Bsin(\frac{\pi}{2})(same for the other term) and see what I get, or should I convert the vector into a complex number and then convert it into the exponential form and then multiply it? Or how is this done? By the way, how do I convert a vector in R^{3} into a complex number? Multiply on the left with e_{1}e_{2}? In R^{2} it is just multiplication by e_{1} on the left.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JonnyMaddox said:
Hi, I want to calculate a rotation of a vector GA style with this formula e^{-B \frac{\pi}{2}}(2e_{1}+3e_{2}+e_{3})e^{B\frac{\pi}{2}}. Now since no book/pdf on GA exists where a calculation is explicitly done with numbers, I wounder how to calculate this. Should I substitude e^{-B \frac{\pi}{2}}=cos (\frac{\pi}{2})-Bsin(\frac{\pi}{2})(same for the other term) and see what I get, or should I convert the vector into a complex number and then convert it into the exponential form and then multiply it? Or how is this done? By the way, how do I convert a vector in R^{3} into a complex number? Multiply on the left with e_{1}e_{2}? In R^{2} it is just multiplication by e_{1} on the left.
Is B the imaginary unit?

Your question is unclear. I am particularly confused by your conjugation by "e^{-B\frac{\pi}{2}}," since I'm not sure how it is acting.

Would you please clarify?
 
Hi Pond Dragon. Sry, the general formula for a rotation is defined as a^{,}= RaR^{\dagger} Where R=nm and R^{\dagger}=mn. Now one uses B= \frac{m\wedge n}{sin \phi}, B^{2}=-1 (unit bivector) and rewrites R=cos \frac{\phi}{2} -B sin \frac{\phi}{2}=e^{-B \frac{\phi}{2}} and R^{\dagger}= cos \frac{\phi}{2} +B sin \frac{\phi}{2}=e^{B \frac{\phi}{2}}. Hope that helps !
Thx for reply.
 
JonnyMaddox said:
Hi Pond Dragon. Sry, the general formula for a rotation is defined as a^{,}= RaR^{\dagger} Where R=nm and R^{\dagger}=mn. Now one uses B= \frac{m\wedge n}{sin \phi}, B^{2}=-1 (unit bivector) and rewrites R=cos \frac{\phi}{2} -B sin \frac{\phi}{2}=e^{-B \frac{\phi}{2}} and R^{\dagger}= cos \frac{\phi}{2} +B sin \frac{\phi}{2}=e^{B \frac{\phi}{2}}. Hope that helps !
Thx for reply.
So, you don't know how to compute the product? It looks like you could just apply definitions.
 
Hi again, so you think this is the right way

(cos \frac{\pi}{2}-Bsin\frac{\pi}{2})(2e_{1}+3e_{2}+e_{3})=-e_{1}B2-e_{2}B3-e_{3}B

then from the right
(-e_{1}B2-e_{2}B3-e_{3}B)(cos\frac{\pi}{2}+Bsin\frac{\pi}{2})=-2e_{1}-3e_{2}+e_{3}
It should be a rotation of 90 degrees, but the two vectors are not orthogonal hm.
 
Hello! There is a simple line in the textbook. If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##. Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##. Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard. Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective...
Back
Top