How can I calculate the eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian with spin 1/2 objects?

[JohanL]

Find the eigenvalues of the hamiltonian

<br /> H=a(S_A \cdot S_B+S_B \cdot S_C+S_C \cdot S_D+S_D \cdot S_A)<br />

where S_A, S_B, S_C, S_D are spin 1/2 objects
_________________________

I rewrite it as

<br /> H=(1/2)*a*[(S_A+S_B+S_C+S_D)^2-(S_A+S_C)^2-(S_B+S_D)^2]<br />

then i define

<br /> J_1=S_A+S_B+S_C+S_D<br />

<br /> J_2=S_A+S_C<br />

<br /> J_3=S_B+S_D<br />

and uses

<br /> J^2_i |j_1j_2j_3;m_1m_2m_3&gt; = (h^2) j_i(j_i+1)|j_1j_2j_3;m_1m_2m_3&gt;<br />

which gives the energies

<br /> E(j_1,j_2,j_3)=(h^2/2)*a*[j_1(j_1+1)-j_2(j_2+1)-j_3(j_3+1)]<br />

Where j_1 is addition of four angular momentum of 1/2 which gives it values of 0 1, 2 and in the same way j_2 and j_3 have values of 0 1.

Am i doing this the right way? It doesn't feel so

 

[StatMechGuy]

From the structure of your hamiltonian it almost looks like you could adapt transfer matrix methods, unless your spin things are vectors (I'm not clear on that). I would also say that there are restrictions on j_2 and j_3 based on j_1, but the thought process seems right.

 

[Meir Achuz]

Your method is completely correct. Just include the a.
Did it just seem too easy?

 

[JohanL]

Your method is completely correct. Just include the a.
Did it just seem too easy?

Thank you. Yes it seemed too easy

 

[JohanL]

How about the degeneracy of the energy levels.
For example E(010)=E(001)=E(111) and then m_1 can take on 9 different values , m_2 and m_3 5 different values. So the degeneracy of this level is 3*9*5*5 ? Is it correct so far?

But then the j_i in turn are addtions of angular momentums.
Does this add even more to the degeneracy?

 

[Meir Achuz]

I would count the degeneracy of each estate as the product of 2j+1 for each sub j. So I think it is 3+3+27 for your example. You shouldn't just count the m's because they are correlated to give the j estates.