How can I calculate the moment generating function for moments about the mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shaiguy6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Moment
shaiguy6
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was wondering if anyone knew how to find a moment generating function about the mean. What I want is a function whose power series expansion gives you a power series where the x^n coefficient is the nth moment about the mean. normally, moment generating functions give you the raw moment (moment about 0). I'd like to convert these to moments about the mean.

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shaiguy6 said:
Hello,

I was wondering if anyone knew how to find a moment generating function about the mean. What I want is a function whose power series expansion gives you a power series where the x^n coefficient is the nth moment about the mean. normally, moment generating functions give you the raw moment (moment about 0). I'd like to convert these to moments about the mean.

Thanks for your help!

The MGF is E[e^(tX)], so to get the central moments if E[X]=m you calculate E[e^(t(X-m))]=e^(-tm)E[e^(tX)]
 
bpet said:
The MGF is E[e^(tX)], so to get the central moments if E[X]=m you calculate E[e^(t(X-m))]=e^(-tm)E[e^(tX)]


Thanks for your help, I don't know how I didn't get this on my own, ugh. Just in case someone uses this thread in the future: You still do the series expansion around 0 (not m) to get moments about a point m.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top