How can I calculate velocity from drag force and other variables?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate velocity from drag force, the relevant formula is F_drag = 0.5 * ρ * v² * A * C_d, where F_drag is the drag force, ρ is fluid density, A is the area, and C_d is the drag coefficient. The discussion highlights that drag is a function of speed, not the other way around, making it challenging to derive velocity directly from drag force. The user seeks to measure speed using a force sensing cell in water, emphasizing the need for a formula that accounts for the drag force exerted on the sensing plate. It is noted that while drag force varies with speed, a specific drag force does not uniquely determine a speed value. The conversation underscores the complexity of calculating velocity from drag in fluid mechanics.
reality1980
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm looking for the formula to get the velocity value from a drag value. I found plenty of resources to do it the other way around (velocity to drag) but no luck to get it the way I need it.

This website seems to have it but they don't provide the rule and they actually want money to enable the calculate button... http://www.lmnoeng.com/Force/DragForce.htm

So basically I have the drag force value, the fluid density, area, force and drag coeff., I want to get the velocity from that.

For some context, I want to use a force sensing cell with a known area facing water towards the heading direction and get my speed value from the force exerted by the water on the sensing cell.

Could anybody help me geopardize the equation to get it right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If I remember fluid mechanics properly

then


F_{drag}= \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 AC_d
 
"Drag" is a force which is proportional to acceleration, not velocity. Do you mean the "terminal speed" when drag opposes some outside force?

(rock.freak667 gives a formula for drag as a function of speed.)
 
Ok yes, maybe I poorly explained what I wanted. Drag is proportional to acceleration, and it's not quite what I want. I'm not sure of the term to use here as I started searching for frontal resistance and wikipedia pushed me towards the drag term.

Let's use an example here... If you're on the road going 20MPH and stick your hand out the window, your hand will be pushed by the air rushing in (which I believe is named frontal resistance). This effect is proportional to speed, not to acceleration and will be constant at a given speed (no, there is no wind in this perfect theory world!). The faster you go, the more pressure is exerted on your hand.

I have a very similar setup; a load cell plate installed on the front of an aquatic vehicle measures the force at which the water pushes on it. I can get a force value with this measurement. Now I need to get a speed value from the force value, the area of the sensing plate and the fluid (water) density.

I'm aware that density changes with temperature but I can compensate for that. All I need is the basic formula to get my velocity.

Thanks :)
 
That's a different matter. That's not a matter of the speed being a function of drag, it a matter of drag being a function of speed! If you have such a function then there must be one value of the drag for each speed but not necessarily a value of speed for each value of the drag, which is what you are asking for.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top