How Can I Design a Tokamak to Ignite Ordinary Air and Control Plasma Diameter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rogerk8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Tokamak
AI Thread Summary
Designing a small Tokamak to ignite ordinary air and control plasma diameter involves significant challenges, particularly regarding the required low pressure and safety concerns. The proposed method of using a toroidal gas discharge tube with electrodes raises questions about feasibility and safety, especially with high voltage and temperatures involved. Experts emphasize the need for proper knowledge and equipment, suggesting that commercial spark gap devices may be a safer alternative. The discussion highlights the complexity of plasma physics and the risks associated with DIY projects in this field. Overall, the idea lacks practicality and safety assurance for amateur experimentation.
rogerk8
Messages
288
Reaction score
1
Hi!

I wish to know how to design a Tokamak of my own.

This Tokamak will of course be very tiny but my intention is to ignite ordinary air and control the plasma's poloidal diameter by poloidal coils placed along the torous.

I wish to do two things with my Tokamak:

1) Ignite ordinary air of suitable pressure (which seem to give a pinkish glow)
2) Be able to adjust the poloidal diameter of the plasma by adjusting toroidal magnetic flux density

I have no clue neither of what (low) pressure is needed nor how to reach it. But I seem to have learned that it needs to be very low.

My thought is to use a toroidal gas disharge tube which is available as spare parts for certain lamps with magnifying lenses built into them.

Drilling two holes into the tube may enable two electrodes to be inserted to ignite the air.

While the electric field intensity probably is the reason for ignition the electrodes should be placed close to each other.

This tube may or may not be avacuated of the luminant couting inside by ordinary acid(?)

When that is done, a nipple may be placed into the hole and thus sealing it.

Putting the nipple to a sucking machine, air pressure may be decreased considerably.

Putting some 10 poloidal coils around the torous and connecting them in series would then give me the possibillity to control the poloidal diameter of the plasma once it has ignited.

Would be quite fun to ignite the plasma, regulate its brightness by the electrical current and the poloidal diameter by the magnetic flux.

Is something like this feasable?

Roger
PS
I love MS Paint but this program is hopeless when it comes to 3D...
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is something like this feasable?
No. It is far off from any realistic way to get a plasma volume.

You clearly do not have the knowledge to do this, or even to do it in a safe way (high voltage, high temperatures, plasma, ...). We won't help you to hurt yourself.
Devices for spark gaps are available as commercial products, you can have a look at them.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Back
Top