How can i differentiate this ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abia ubong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on differentiating a complex expression involving nested exponentials, specifically a power tower. It is noted that the power tower is defined within the range e^{-e} to e^{1/e}, with the upper limit approximately 1.44467. The expression is claimed to yield 0 for x<1, 1 for x=1, and infinity for x>1, leading to a derivative of zero for 0≤x≤1 and undefined for x>1. The importance of being able to graph the function is emphasized, suggesting that if one cannot graph it, differentiating may also be infeasible. Overall, the complexity of the expression raises questions about its differentiability and graphical representation.
abia ubong
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I wonder if this can be differentiated ,if it can then what is the derivative of
[x^x^x^x^x^x...]^[(x^2)^(x^2)^(x^2)...]^[(x^3)^(x^3)^(x^3)...]^[(x^4)^(x^5)...]......
thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
what do all the dots mean? What order do you want the exponentiation in (it's not associative)?
 
From left to right i guess.I assume it resembles power tower.


Daniel.
 
The power tower:

y(x)=x^{x^{x^. . .}}}

is defined for:

e^{-e}\leq x\leq e^{1/e}

Note that the upper limit for a power tower is about 1.44467. However above, you're using "2" and larger values, you know x^2 and more. Thus I claim the expression is 0 for x<1, 1 for x=1, and infinity for x>1. It's derivative therefore is zero for 0\leq x\leq 1 and undefined for x>1.

However, I've just started looking at it and wouldn't bet more than a dollar.
 
Here's a better question - "Can you draw the graph of it ?"

If you cannot draw a graph of that thing, then chances are pretty good that you can't differentiate it either.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top