How can I effectively prove that f(L) = L in this problem?

AI Thread Summary
To prove that f(L) = L, it is established that the limit of the sequence defined by a_n = f(a_{n-1}) converges to L, leading to the conclusion that f(L) = L due to the continuity of f. The example using f(x) = cos(x) with a = 1 results in an approximate value of L = 0.73908, calculated by iteratively applying the cosine function until convergence to five decimal places. Feedback suggests that presenting L on the left side of the equation may enhance clarity in the proof. Overall, the approach is correct, and alternative methods for finding L could include graphical or numerical analysis. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clarity in mathematical proofs.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
Problem:

(a) Let a_1 = a, a_2 = f(a), a_3 = f(a_2) = f(f(a)), \ldots, a_{n+1} = f(a_n), where f is a continuous function. If \lim _{n \to \infty} = L, show that f(L) = L.

(b) Illustrate part (a) by taking f(x) = \cos x , a = 1, and estimating the value of L to five decimal places.

My answer:

(a) \lim _{n \to \infty} a_{n+1} = \lim _{n \to \infty} f(a_n) = f \left( \lim _{n \to \infty} a_n \right) = f(L) = L

(b) I have used my calculator to get this one. First, I plugged in: \cos 1. I took the cosine of the result. Then, I kept on taking the cosine until my results agreed to five decimal places. I got L \approx 0.73908.

My question:

Did I get it right? Are there other ways to find answer (b)?

Thanks a lot! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
0.73908 looks right assuming a=1 rad.
 
thiago_j said:
Problem:

(a) Let a_1 = a, a_2 = f(a), a_3 = f(a_2) = f(f(a)), \ldots, a_{n+1} = f(a_n), where f is a continuous function. If \lim _{n \to \infty} = L, show that f(L) = L.

(b) Illustrate part (a) by taking f(x) = \cos x , a = 1, and estimating the value of L to five decimal places.

My answer:

(a) \lim _{n \to \infty} a_{n+1} = \lim _{n \to \infty} f(a_n) = f \left( \lim _{n \to \infty} a_n \right) = f(L) = L

(b) I have used my calculator to get this one. First, I plugged in: \cos 1. I took the cosine of the result. Then, I kept on taking the cosine until my results agreed to five decimal places. I got L \approx 0.73908.

My question:

Did I get it right? Are there other ways to find answer (b)?

Thanks a lot! :smile:
I think it would be more convincing if you wrote L= first on the left hand side and then came to f(L) on the right hand side. You basically have f(L)=L in your argument which is what you want to prove. Right idea though.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top