How Can I Find the 4th Coordinate of a Parallelogram in 3D Space?

AI Thread Summary
To find the fourth coordinate of a parallelogram in 3D space when given three vertices, one can utilize the property that opposite sides are parallel and equal in magnitude. By identifying the vectors formed by the three given vertices, the fourth vertex can be determined by adding the appropriate vectors to one of the existing vertices. It is important to recognize that with three vertices, two vectors represent the sides of the parallelogram, while the third vector can be viewed as a diagonal. Understanding these vector relationships is crucial for solving the problem. Geometry in three-dimensional space often involves visualizing these relationships to find missing coordinates effectively.
yourmom98
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
i am given the (x,y,z) coordinates of 3 sides of a parallelogram how do i go about finding the 4 coordinate. do i find the distance between points using the same way to find vectors then try to find direction angles or something like that? because there is no slope or anything to compare too. Also any tips about geometry in 3 space would be greatly appreciated
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Could you use the fact that opposite sides of a parallelogram are parallel and equal in magnitude (basically, the same vector)?
 
You mean, I presume, a parallelpiped, the 3 dimensional analog of a parallelogram. If you are given three vertices, then you know three vectors that form the sides of the parallelpiped. Adding the three vectors to one vertex will give you the opposite vertex.
 
Thanks HallsofIvy for correcting me. But i don't understand if I am given 3 vertices i would only know 2 vectors that form the parallelepiped and one vector that is a diagonal of the parallelepiped.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top