How Can I Find the 4th Coordinate of a Parallelogram in 3D Space?

AI Thread Summary
To find the fourth coordinate of a parallelogram in 3D space when given three vertices, one can utilize the property that opposite sides are parallel and equal in magnitude. By identifying the vectors formed by the three given vertices, the fourth vertex can be determined by adding the appropriate vectors to one of the existing vertices. It is important to recognize that with three vertices, two vectors represent the sides of the parallelogram, while the third vector can be viewed as a diagonal. Understanding these vector relationships is crucial for solving the problem. Geometry in three-dimensional space often involves visualizing these relationships to find missing coordinates effectively.
yourmom98
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
i am given the (x,y,z) coordinates of 3 sides of a parallelogram how do i go about finding the 4 coordinate. do i find the distance between points using the same way to find vectors then try to find direction angles or something like that? because there is no slope or anything to compare too. Also any tips about geometry in 3 space would be greatly appreciated
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Could you use the fact that opposite sides of a parallelogram are parallel and equal in magnitude (basically, the same vector)?
 
You mean, I presume, a parallelpiped, the 3 dimensional analog of a parallelogram. If you are given three vertices, then you know three vectors that form the sides of the parallelpiped. Adding the three vectors to one vertex will give you the opposite vertex.
 
Thanks HallsofIvy for correcting me. But i don't understand if I am given 3 vertices i would only know 2 vectors that form the parallelepiped and one vector that is a diagonal of the parallelepiped.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top