How can I find the tension in a pendulum cord at a specific angle?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the tension in a pendulum cord when the pendulum is at a specific angle to the vertical. The problem involves concepts from mechanics, specifically relating to forces acting on a pendulum and energy conservation principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between potential and kinetic energy as the pendulum moves between angles. They discuss the use of free-body diagrams and question the necessity of these diagrams for solving the problem. There are attempts to derive equations based on energy conservation and net forces acting on the mass.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing their calculations and reasoning. Some have provided hints and guidance on how to approach the problem, while others are questioning their assumptions and the validity of their calculations. There is a collaborative effort to clarify concepts and refine the approach to finding the tension.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific angles and heights in their calculations, indicating a focus on the geometry of the pendulum's motion. There is also a discussion about the reference point for height in relation to gravitational force, which may influence their calculations.

Jordan_
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hey, I have this question here, the hardest one on this sheet, and I've been stuck on it all day now. I'd really appreciate maybe just a hint, as I want to do it myself but I just need a kickstart.

A mass 'm' hangs at the end of a pendulum of length 'L' which is released at an angle of 40 degrees to the vertical. Find the tension in the pendulum cord when it makes an angle of 20 degrees to the vertical.

Ans: 1.29mg

I drew three free body diagrams for each position of the pendulum, then marked off tension and the force of gravity. I ended up with three equations but it never went anywhere and I truly am stuck on this. Any hints would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You won't be needing a free-body diagram for this one. It's easy enough to do in your head :P (the FBD part that is)

2 Concepts

qn1: what is the change in potential energy and gain in kinetic energy from 40 degrees to the 20 degrees?

qn2: what is the force needed to keep such a mass with such kinetic energy in circular motion?
 
mezarashi said:
You won't be needing a free-body diagram for this one. It's easy enough to do in your head :P (the FBD part that is)

2 Concepts

qn1: what is the change in potential energy and gain in kinetic energy from 40 degrees to the 20 degrees?

qn2: what is the force needed to keep such a mass with such kinetic energy in circular motion?

Yea you are right about the FBD's in my head, I was just stuck and decided to draw a picture :biggrin:

For question 1, I set the length to one just to play around with the question. By doing that, I found that the heigh at point at (40degrees) was 0.234m, and at point B it was 0.06m. By solving the equation
PEa = PEb + KEb, I got v = 1.85 m/s.

Then I got the idea I could use Fnet = mv^2/r - maybe I will try solving for the mass now or something. Anyways I will keep trying with this.

I have no idea if that is what you were suggesting? I'm just playing around with it trying to see if something can be done.

I also converted the 60 degree trip in total to rads, and got 1.05 rads. Am I getting warmer or colder? lol

For question 2, I'm not done with the first question, but I willget back to you.

Thanks for your help so far :smile:
 
As long as your doing along the lines of [tex]PE = mgLcos\theta[/tex] you're on the right track.
 
Okay, I really think I'm on to something here.

PE = mgLcos(theta)
Code:
PEa = PEb + KEb
mgH = mgH + mv^2/2
cancel the m's
gL0.234 = gL0.06 + v^2/2
2.29L = 0.588L + v^2/2
3.404L = v^2

Then I subbed that into Fnet = mv^2/R

Fnet = m3.404L/R

and then I canceled the L and the R since I assumed they were the same thing, and I'm left with Fnet = 3.404m

Better?:bugeye:
 
Last edited:
Yes, very legitimate. I'm just a bit curious with the 0.234 and 0.06 you put behind the L's. If those are checked, I think you just hit jackpot. :D

Oh, Fnet isn't the complete end of the story yet though. Some basic FBD stuff to do yet to find the tension as it's also fighting against gravity.
 
mezarashi said:
Yes, very legitimate. I'm just a bit curious with the 0.234 and 0.06 you put behind the L's. If those are checked, I think you just hit jackpot. :D

Oh, Fnet isn't the complete end of the story yet though. Some basic FBD stuff to do yet to find the tension as it's also fighting against gravity.

My thinking when I did the 0.234 and 0.06 was this: (I could be wrong)

When we've done these questions in class before (it's a grade 12 physics class), when the pendulum is on y-axis going straight down, it is assumed it's height is zero. So if there is a 40 degree line that is going off of the vertical, then you do the cosine thing and get the number 0.766.This is the height from the end of the 40 degree line to the x-axis above. So for me, I subtracted this number from 1 and got 0.234.

Same procedure for the other one too. Does this make sense to you or have I made an error?
 
1/2 mv squared = t - mg
is that the final formula that would work
with v squared being whatever we get from the energy equations?
 
Last edited:
I drew my new FBD, and came up with this.

Fnet = 0.348mg <----I went back and redid it without adding in the gravity, wanted to leave it as a letter just like in the answer.

So my new equation according to my FBD was:

0.348mg = T - mg
T = 1.348mg

I'm off slightly. Can anyone see where I made a mistake?
 
  • #10
Jordan_ said:
Same procedure for the other one too. Does this make sense to you or have I made an error?

Alright, so you've assumed that the bottom of the pendulum is h=0. That's perfectly fine.

Jordan_ said:
0.348mg = T - mg
T = 1.348mg

Now that you've justified the velocity at this point. You need to be a bit more careful with the FBD at 20 degrees. What direction is Fnet? What direction is T, the tension? What direction is gravity?
 
  • #11
mezarashi said:
Alright, so you've assumed that the bottom of the pendulum is h=0. That's perfectly fine.
Now that you've justified the velocity at this point. You need to be a bit more careful with the FBD at 20 degrees. What direction is Fnet? What direction is T, the tension? What direction is gravity?
i see what you mean and it worked
but only if i apply the cos20 to mg
not if i apply it to T
why's that?
thanks for your time :)
 
  • #12
Ahhh okay I did it now!

Because this FBD will be tilted, the gravity will be -mgcostheta which makes it -0.940mg.

So the equation would be
0.348mg = T - 0.940mg
1.29mg = T

Thanks so much for your help man! Appreciate it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
20K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K