A How can I formulate spectral methods for numerical computation?

RobosaurusRex
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I am new to spectral methods, does anyone have a good reference which shows some worked examples of formulating the method to be computed?
E.g. go from the general governing equations through transformation to the form which will be passed to a computer.

Cheers
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
One of my go-to references for computational methods is Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer by Richard H. Pletcher, John C. Tannehill, Dale Anderson. The book shows derivations and applications to different types of mass transfer problems and has a section on spectral methods. Maybe you can find a copy at your library.
 
NFuller said:
One of my go-to references for computational methods is Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer by Richard H. Pletcher, John C. Tannehill, Dale Anderson. The book shows derivations and applications to different types of mass transfer problems and has a section on spectral methods. Maybe you can find a copy at your library.

Can you tell me which version of the book and which chapter you are referring to?
I have third edition and I cannot find spectral methods in the glossary.

Thanks for the quick reply.
 
I also have the fourth edition but I don't have the book on hand right now. From what I remember is was talked about in the Application of numerical methods to selected model equations. If it's not in there, another good resource on this is chapter 13 of Numerical Recipes.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top