How Can I Measure Relative Amplitudes of Specific Frequencies in a Noise Field?

AI Thread Summary
To measure relative amplitudes of specific frequencies in a noise field, using capacitive microphones attached to resonant tubes is suggested. The discussion emphasizes the importance of sampling at more than twice the highest frequency for accurate detection, recommending the use of fast Fourier transform (FFT) for analysis. Tools like MatLab can facilitate plotting the Power Spectrum to visualize frequency responses. Additionally, the positioning of the microphone can significantly affect the power spectrum, potentially revealing destructive interference patterns at certain frequencies. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate amplitude measurement in noise fields.
Bert Rackett
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I would like to measure the relative amplitudes (energy levels) of several specific
frequencies in a noise field. I thought of attaching capacitive microphones to
tubes that would resonate at those frequencies. I've visited hundreds of web sites
that invariably give equations for frequencies and resonant points, but say nothing
about the amplitude domain unless they're talking about musical instruments.
How much larger will my response be in my tube? How large are the harmonic
responses? I have several texts, but they speak qualitatively about resonances and
not quantitatively. can someone point out a text with the math?
Thank you.
Bert Rackett
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as you're sampling at more than twice the highest frequency you want to detect, can't you just put the signal through a fast Fourier transform? You could use something like MatLab to do this and plot the Power Spectrum quite easily.

It would be interesting to see how the power spectrum changes in relation to the position of your microphone. You might expect to see notches at frequencies with wavelengths that destructively interfere with reflections off of the surrounding walls.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top