How Can I Measure the Impact Protection of Running Shoes?

AI Thread Summary
To measure the impact protection of running shoes, an accelerometer and stress transducers are recommended for data collection. A data-logging system, potentially available through schools, can record the necessary signals but may be bulky. The discussion also touches on the runner's side pain experienced at higher paces, suggesting that measuring shoe shock absorption may not directly address the issue. Alternative solutions, such as cycling or investing in high-quality running shoes, are proposed. Overall, while technical measurement can be interesting, it may not provide a definitive solution to the runner's problem.
stryped
Messages
51
Reaction score
3
Can anyone recommend a device or way I can measure the impact protection qualities of different running shoes? I am a runner and would be interested in doing this myself.

I appreciate it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need an accelerometer. You can probably buy a small one that might work.
 
Can you recommend one or how to set this kind of test up?
 
You would also need some small stress transducers to fit under your foot in various locations. The signals from these plus the accelerometers would need to be recorded on a data-logger, strapped to the runner.
There are a number of data-logging systems available for schools, which could possibly be used. They would be more bulky than you might like, ideally, but they would be relatively straightforward to fit and not too expensive. They come with USB interface and display / calculating software.
It all depends on how you are with technical construction.
 
Would this be expensive? Unfortunately I do not know anyone with acess to equipment like that. I am very mechanically inclined.

I am a runner with a pain in my side only after running two or more miles and running at a 6:20 pace or faster. It does not happen when going slower or biking or whatever. It is partially due to my footfalls I believe. I would like a way to quantify shoe shock absorbing. I run about 50 miles per week.

Again sorry for all the questions. I really appreciate it! Doctors and MRI's can figure out my problem. I hope science can lol...
 
I am not sure that actually measuring the forces on your feet / legs would help you. It would be 'interesting' but wouldn't lead to any solution for your problem, I fear.
There is one possible solution for your problem - but you don't want to go there, I'm sure. Stopping running would help! Did you consider an alternative loony way of knackering yourself, perhaps (I have been there too aamof)? Cycling is equally knackering and fun but doesn't involve the impulsive shocks that running gives you.

Perhaps you should invest in the most expensive, specialist running shoes you can find. I know some runners who say that a local shop, here in Brighton, has sorted them out with some brilliant shoes - but they would say that, after spending crazy sums of money!
Good luck with the problem.

I am very mechanically inclined.
Was there a "not" missing from that sentence, by any chance? If you are handy with electronics then possibly an Arduino board and some peripherals could give you some answers for not many tens of Quids (BP)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top