Discussion Overview
The discussion focuses on methods to measure the transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) mode splitting in microcavities, particularly in the context of using waveplates and polarized light. Participants explore experimental setups and techniques relevant to planar and structured microcavities, including the use of half wave plates and polarizers.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Experimental/applied
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant suggests using a combination of waveplates and polarized light to measure TE-TM splitting, but expresses uncertainty about the specifics.
- Another participant clarifies the definitions of TE and TM modes and notes that the splitting varies with the wave vector (k) and is zero at normal incidence.
- A participant confirms the use of a half wave plate in the excitation path to find energy dispersion but questions whether additional components are needed in the signal path.
- There is a discussion about the necessity of a polarizer in the beam path if polarized light is not already available.
- One participant mentions using a continuous laser and a linear polarizer but reports no change in the dispersion relation, raising questions about the detection setup.
- A later reply raises concerns about the spectral resolution of the detector and the angular resolution of the light beam, suggesting that the observed shift might be very small.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express various approaches to measuring TE-TM splitting, but there is no consensus on the optimal setup or whether additional components are necessary. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the effectiveness of the proposed methods.
Contextual Notes
Participants note the potential smallness of the TE-TM splitting and its dependence on the angle of incidence, which may complicate measurements. There are also uncertainties regarding the resolution capabilities of the detection system.