How Can I Modify My Equation to Become a Continuous-Time Function?

AI Thread Summary
To modify the equation y = αe^(βW) into a continuous-time function y(t), where f changes with time, the equation can be expressed as y(t) = ae^(bf(t))e^((cf + d)∫_0^t f(u) du). This formulation incorporates the time-dependent nature of f, allowing for the evaluation of y at any point in time. However, the explicit dependence on t may not provide additional insights without knowing the specific form of f. The discussion emphasizes that the original equation can already be considered a continuous function of t. Understanding the behavior of f over time is crucial for further modifications.
sooyewguan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Lets say I have an equation,

y=\alpha e^{\beta W}

where,
\alpha = a e^{b f} and \beta = c f + d

W = \int^{T}_{0}f dt

My problem now is, what happen if f is changing with time t, f(t)

How do I modify my main equation, y, so that it become an continuous-time function, y(t).

Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you mean: what you give
y= \alpha e^\beta W(t)[/itex]<br /> <b>is</b> a &quot;continuous-time function&quot;- or at least a continuous function of t.<br /> <br /> If you want to you can replace each of \alpha, \beta, and W with their explicit dependence on t:<br /> y(t)= ae^{bf(t)} e^{(cf+d)\int_0^t f(u)du}<br /> (I&#039;ve changed the dummy variable in the integral to u so as not to confuse it with the variable t.)<br /> <br /> But I don&#039;t think that really adds anything as long as you don&#039;t know the explicit form of f.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top