How can I prove that n/(n+1) = 1-[1/(n+1)]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter red_hockey
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To prove that n/(n+1) equals 1 - [1/(n+1)], one approach is to rewrite n/(n+1) as ((n+1) - 1)/(n+1). This manipulation reveals that the expression simplifies to 1 - [1/(n+1)]. Alternatively, starting with the second fraction, 1 - [1/(n+1)], and finding a common denominator can also lead to the same result. This method emphasizes the importance of understanding how to manipulate fractions to demonstrate equivalence. Overall, both strategies highlight the relationship between the two expressions effectively.
red_hockey
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am beginning to teach myself series/sequences but I keep running into issues getting started.

A common example I keep seeing is: n/(n+1)
This almost always gets set to: 1 - [1/(n+1)]

I have tried to work out the proof of this myself, but I can't seem to get the two to equal each other/manipulate the first to equal the second.

Could someone point me towards what i have to do to the first fraction? Should be an easy thing but I can't put my finger on it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey,

write n/(n+1) as ((n+1)-1)/(n+1)

What do you see?
 
ooohhhhhhh
thanks a lot, very helpful, good hint.
 
red_hockey said:
I have tried to work out the proof of this myself, but I can't seem to get the two to equal each other/manipulate the first to equal the second.

Could someone point me towards what i have to do to the first fraction? Should be an easy thing but I can't put my finger on it.

The easier way of proving this would be to work with the second fraction, then hopefully come up with how you can reverse the procedure.
Why we want to work with the end result is because the first fraction is just one fraction, which means to get from

1-\frac{1}{n+1} to \frac{n}{n+1} we need to start by taking the common denominator, that is, putting the fraction all under the same denominator.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...

Similar threads

Back
Top