How Can I Prove These Topology Statements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rolylane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Topology
rolylane
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello

I have a proof that I need to try to work out but I'm not really getting too far and need help if you could at all. The question is

Let A and B be two subsets of a metric space X. Prove that:
Int(A)\bigcupInt(B)\subseteqInt(A\bigcupB) and Int(A)\bigcapInt(B) = Int(A\bigcapB)
I also have to give an example of two subsets A and B such that Int(A) \bigcup Int (B) ≠ Int (A\bigcup B)

Any help at all would be so great
Cheers
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let x be in intA U int B. Then, WLOG, assume x is in int A. Then there exist a basis element U containing x and contained in A and therefore contained in A U B. The second question requires doing this in both directions.
 
Topology

Hi andytoh

Thank you for taking the time to reply to my question. Just one thing, I'm new to this so could you tell me what WLOG means?

Thanks again



andytoh said:
Let x be in intA U int B. Then, WLOG, assume x is in int A. Then there exist a basis element U containing x and contained in A and therefore contained in A U B. The second question requires doing this in both directions.
 
"Without loss of generality", since the roles of A and B are symmetric.

Incidentally, #1 can be generalized to any collection (finite or infinite) of subsets, and #2 can be generalized to any finite collection of subsets.
 
Last edited:
Counterexample of Int(A) U Int (B) ≠ Int (A U B):
A=[-1,0], B=[0,1]

Counterexample of #2 with an infinite collection of subsets:
Use {(-1,1), (-1/2,1/2), (-1/3,1/3), (-1/4,1/4), ... }
Left side = {0}, but right side = empty.
 
Last edited:
topology

Thank you so much, once again, for your replies. I really appreciate your help

Cheers
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top