How can I prove this using the remainder theorem?

Hyperreality
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
If p^2 is exactly divisible by p+q, then proof q^2 is exactly divisible by p+q.

How do I proof this, and how do I apply the remainder theorem?

I know if f(x) = x^2 + 2x + 1, since f(-1) = 0 there fore (x + 1) is a factor of f(x).

So in this case
p^2 = p x p or p^2 x 1...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since you specifically mention x2+ 2x+ 1, haven't you looked at (p+q)<sup>2</sup>= p<sup>2</sup>+ 2pq+ q<sup>2</sup>?
 
This is what I've done afterwards, but I'm not sure if it is right.

Let p^2 = x^2 + 2xy + y^2.

where y^2 = y.y or -y.-y or x^2 = x.x or -x.-x.

When y = -x, or x = -y, p^2 = 0

Therefore (x + y) is a factor of p^2, also (x + y) = (p + q)

Therefore p^2 = p^2 + 2pq + p^2. p^2 = 0 when p = -q,

but (p)^2 = (-q)^2
p^2 = q^2
therefore (p+q)mod q^2 = 0

Are there any flaw in my argument or have I made any calcuation error?
 
Sorry, it's q^2mod(p+q) = 0
 
Originally posted by Hyperreality
This is what I've done afterwards, but I'm not sure if it is right.

Let p^2 = x^2 + 2xy + y^2.

where y^2 = y.y or -y.-y or x^2 = x.x or -x.-x.

When y = -x, or x = -y, p^2 = 0

Therefore (x + y) is a factor of p^2, also (x + y) = (p + q)

Therefore p^2 = p^2 + 2pq + p^2. p^2 = 0 when p = -q,

but (p)^2 = (-q)^2
p^2 = q^2
therefore (p+q)mod q^2 = 0

Are there any flaw in my argument or have I made any calcuation error?
p^2=P^2+2pq+q^2
-2pq=q^2
-2p=q
p=-q/2
not p=-q
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top