How can I simplify and evaluate this sum using binomial coefficients?

  • Thread starter Thread starter saudyonline
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To evaluate the given sum involving binomial coefficients, it is suggested to break it into manageable parts, starting with known sums. The first part can be simplified using a geometric series formula, while subsequent terms can be handled similarly by peeling off geometric series. An alternative approach involves rewriting the sum to recognize it as a derivative of a geometric series, which can lead to a closed form. For the second sum, the focus should be on manipulating it into a recognizable form of binomial coefficients. Ultimately, correcting the numerator will allow for the identification of the remaining sum as a sum of binomial coefficients.
saudyonline
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
dear all ,
i need to know how can i solve the following

Evaluate the sum

<img>http://geocities.com/saudyonline/images/untitled.bmp</img>

please if the image doesn't appear . please copy the link in your browser and see my question
thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi, I'll give you a kick on the first one. Try breaking it up into a bunch of sums you know how to deal with. I'll "peel off" the first one for you:

\sum_{i=1}^{n}ia^{i}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}a^{i}+\sum_{i=2}^{n}(i-1)a^{i}

The first sum is a geometric series starting with a, which you probably have a formula for. The second sum now has one less term. Do the same trick on the second sum, peel off a geometric series starting with a^2:

\sum_{i=1}^{n}a^{i}+\sum_{i=2}^{n}(i-1)a^{i}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}a^{i}+\sum_{i=2}^{n}a^{i}+\sum_{i=3}^{n}(i-2)a^{i}

So we have a geometric series starting with a, one starting with a^2, and our last sum now has one less term. Keep doing this to get a sum of geometric series starting at a, a^2, a^3, and so on. Use your formula for geometric series and life should be good.


This isn't the only way to do this sum of course. You could rewrite it as a\sum_{i=1}^{n}ia^{i-1}
and try to recognize the sum part as a derivative of a geometric series. You can use this to get a closed form (i.e. a 'nice' formula) for this sum. I'm not sure which way is preferable, I like double sums and I'm not sure our "nice" formla will be very nice, so I'd probably use the first.
 
For the second one, you'll want to do a similar thing-get rid of the extra i factor and massage it into a sum of binomial coefficients which you should know a formula for their sum. Rewrite as:

\sum_{i=0}^{n}i\frac{n!}{i!(n-i)!}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{n!}{(i-1)!(n-i)!}

The i=0 term is just 0 so I dropped it. Now this isn't quite a sum of binomial coefficients, because the terms aren't binomial coefficients yet, the numerator of each term is off. I'll leave it to you to figure out how to correct this. Once you do, you should be able to recognize the remaining sum as a sum of certain binomial coefficients..
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top