How can I solve for t using the complete the square method?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jazduck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation t^2 + t = 5.1 using the complete the square method, first rewrite it as t^2 + t - 5.1 = 0. Identify that a = 1/2, leading to the addition of 1/4 to both sides, resulting in t^2 + t + 1/4 = 5.35. This transforms the left side into a perfect square: (t + 1/2)^2 = 5.35. Finally, take the square root of both sides to find the values of t, considering both positive and negative roots.
jazduck
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have an equation which I ended up with as t^2 + t = 5.1

How do I then solve for t (without just plugging it into solve on the calculator)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This should be in the homework section. You can solve it by using the ABC-formula.
 
Cyosis - The question is not homework so I put it in general math. The actual question I'm trying is one on the initial velocity of an object required to catch another object released a second before it over a 50m displacement. Not that hard if I make my calculator solve it, just making a mess of the algebra because I havn't done it in 8 years.

Anyway will look up the ABC rule.
 
The solution to an equation of the form ax^2+bx+c=0 is given by x=\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}. To make use of this formula you will have to write t^2+t=5.1 as t^2+t-5.1=0.
 
Alternatively, you could "complete the square".

For any number, a,
(t- a)^2= t^2- 2at+ a^2
You have t^2+ t= 5.1 which will match the first two terms of that if 2at= t or a= 1/2. In that case a^2= 1/4 so adding 1/4 to both sides of the equation: t^2+ t+ 1/4= 5.1+ 1/4= 5.1+ .25= 5.35

Now that the left side is a "perfect square" you have (t+ 1/2)^2= 5.35 and you can solve that by taking the square root of both sides (remembering that the result can be either positive or negative).
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top