How can I use theorems to derive a statement about inequalities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evagelos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deriving
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the inequality a^2 + b^2 + c^2 ≥ ab + bc + ac using established theorems and identities. Participants suggest leveraging the properties of squares, such as (a-b)^2 ≥ 0, (b-c)^2 ≥ 0, and (a-c)^2 ≥ 0, to support the derivation. The AM-GM inequality is also recommended for use with pairs of variables to reinforce the argument. The conversation emphasizes the importance of these mathematical tools in proving the stated inequalities. Overall, the thread highlights methods for applying theorems to establish relationships between variables in inequalities.
evagelos
Messages
314
Reaction score
0
By using appropriate theorems derive the following statement :

a^2 + b^2 + c^2\geq ab + bc +ac
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
(a-b)^2 \geq 0
(b-c)^2 \geq 0
(a-c)^2 \geq 0
Try using these identities to derive your statement. Or if you've learn about the AM-GM inequality, then use it one two variables on the right at a time (this is the same as using the identities above).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top