How can information be conserved if we live in a quantum universe?

zeromodz
Messages
244
Reaction score
0
For example, after the big bang, the only thing that decides the future is Newtons laws. However, we must take into account quantum effects we cannot be for sure what the future holds. Doesn't the same thing apply with information. How can we know the information about a system if there is quantum uncertainty?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Classical physics, including Newtons laws, are known to be incorrect. (or at least inaccurate) As such the future is NOT decided by Newtons laws.
 
Physicists speaks of two kinds of information; classical information (appropriate in a Newtonian world picture) and quantum information (appropriate in the real world). Conservation of quantum information is at the heart of physics.

zeromodz said:
How can we know the information about a system if there is quantum uncertainty?

You'r right; we can't (always) know the information about a system, because of quantum uncertainties. But here nature gets weird: If we (that is, none, however technically advanced) cannot know the information about a system, then the information isn't there! It simply isn't defined. For example:
The information about exactly where an electron is, doesn't exist.
The information about where the electron certainly isn't do exist, and is conserved. That is to say that in the future, the electron won't be at a position where you know with certainty that it can't be (which sounds reasonable enough...).

Information is not an easy concept.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top