Is information conserved in quantum physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Leonard Susskind asserts that information is conserved in quantum physics, despite the inherent randomness introduced by quantum mechanics. The present state of a system is determined by past events within its light cone, governed by the laws of nature, but quantum uncertainty complicates this relationship. While quantum mechanics allows for the calculation of probabilities for future states, the act of measurement collapses these probabilities, leading to a perceived loss of information. This phenomenon is linked to the measurement problem or wave-function collapse, which remains unresolved in contemporary physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of light cones in relativity
  • Knowledge of probability theory in the context of quantum states
  • Awareness of the measurement problem in quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of wave-function collapse in quantum mechanics
  • Study Leonard Susskind's theories on information conservation
  • Explore the relationship between quantum randomness and determinism
  • Investigate current solutions to the measurement problem in quantum physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the foundational questions of information theory and measurement in quantum physics.

Gerinski
Messages
322
Reaction score
15
Leonard Susskind says so. But I don't see it.

Yes, the present "here and now" is computed by nature from the events lying in its past light cone + the laws of nature. If we assume a deterministic universe, the present "here and now" contains the information from the events in its past light cone.

But when we introduce quantum randomness and uncertainty, we can not say that anymore. The present "here and now" is computed by the events in its past light cone + the laws of nature, + an element of uncertainty or randomness. The "here and now" can never tell us precisely what the past events were like, because it may have been defined by a random quantum "jump" altering what classical theory would have predicted.

So, in which way can we say that information is conserved when we include quantum mechanics? Surely Susskind is much more clever than I am so I must be wrong in something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have touched on one of the great mysteries. Quantum physics describes a precise way to determine the future quantum state. This might tell us in the future that there is an exact probability for each outcome. Information is conserved in the sense that quantum state (that tells us the probabilities) can be advanced forward and backward in time to tell us the probabilities at any other time.

However once something actually happens1 then the probability for it becomes 1 and the probability for all other outcomes becomes 0. This can imply a loss of information. We explain this by the existence of some element outside the system which has interacted with it.

So with conventional thinking at least, we would conclude that something special seems to happen at the end of the experiment. This quandary is sometimes called the measurement problem or wave-function collapse. This issue has not been fully resolved.

1 perhaps a problematic notion in light of quantum physics
 
But when a measurement is made, the future is different, so maybe that new future encodes the new information?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K