How Can Integration by Parts Be Applied to Solve Advanced Calculus Problems?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on applying integration by parts to the integral \(\int_{a}^{b}\frac{d}{dr}(r\frac{dT(r)}{dr})\psi(r)dr\) and demonstrating that it can be expressed as \(-\lambda^2\bar{T}\), where \(\bar{T}=\int_{a}^{b}r\psi(r)T(r)dr\). The participants discuss the challenges of performing integration by parts twice, particularly with the function \(\psi(r)\) satisfying the differential equation \(\frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr}(r\frac{d\psi(r)}{dr})+\lambda^2\psi(r)=0\). The correct approach involves manipulating the terms and utilizing the properties of the differential equation to simplify the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration by parts in calculus
  • Familiarity with differential equations, specifically second-order linear ODEs
  • Knowledge of Bessel functions and their properties
  • Experience with tabular integration methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced techniques in integration by parts for complex integrals
  • Learn about the properties and applications of Bessel functions
  • Explore numerical methods for solving differential equations
  • Investigate the implications of boundary conditions in integral equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on advanced calculus, differential equations, and mathematical physics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of integration techniques and their applications in solving complex problems.

timman_24
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Integrate the following by parts twice

[itex]\int_{a}^{b}\frac{d}{dr}(r\frac{dT(r)}{dr})\psi(r)dr[/itex]

and show that it can be written as [itex]-\lambda^2\bar{T}[/itex] , where

[itex]\bar{T}=\int_{a}^{b}r\psi(r)T(r)dr[/itex]

and the function [itex]\psi[/itex] satisfies the following equation

[itex]\frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr}(r\frac{d\psi(r)}{dr})+\lambda^2\psi(r)=0[/itex]

Relevant equations and attempt

Of course the integration by parts equation, but I used the tabular method to get the first integration of:

[itex]\psi(r)r\frac{dT(r)}{dr}-\int_{a}^{b}\psi\prime(r)r\frac{dT(r)}{dr}dr[/itex]

But as you can see in the next step it gets more complicated because the v choice now needs integration by parts as well and since the T(r) portion will end up being an integral without a definite solution, I don't know where to take it from there. I tried to get things to cancel but haven't found a way yet. Am I going about this the wrong way?

On the second integration by parts I tried to group [itex]\psi\prime(r)r[/itex] together under u and it cleaned up v, but u became a mess without a way to cancel.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am a little rusty on this stuff and this was provided as a refresher problem to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've given it my best shot and have tried just about every way possible. There must be some trick or technique that I haven't learned yet to deal with this. If anyone has any thoughts about how I might tackle it, it would be much appreciated.

Thanks
 
timman_24 said:
If anyone has any thoughts about how I might tackle it, it would be much appreciated.

Thanks

I got thoughts but it's not exactly as you put it. For starters, I assume you mean the following problem:

Let [itex]\psi(r)[/itex] satisfy the following DE:

[tex]\frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr}(r\frac{d\psi(r)}{dr})+\lambda^2\psi(r)=0[/tex]

then show:

[tex]\int_{a}^{b}\frac{d}{dr}(r\frac{dT(r)}{dr})\psi(r) dr=-\lambda^2\int_a^b r\psi T dr[/tex]

But that's not what I get. You did parts once, how about do it again to obtain:

[tex]r\psi \frac{dT}{dr}-rT\psi'+\int T(r\psi''+\psi')[/tex]

now, using the differential equation, this looks to me to be:

[tex]\int_{a}^{b}\frac{d}{dr}(r\frac{dT(r)}{dr})\psi(r) dr=\left(r\psi T'-rT\psi'\right)_a^b-\lambda^2\int_a^b r\psi T[/tex]

and this is consistent with numerical calculations letting [itex]\psi(r)=\text{BesselJ}(0,\lambda r)[/itex] and [itex]T(r)=r^2+2r[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K