Chemistry How Can Isoxazole Be Synthesized from Furoxan and Phenylacetylene?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on synthesizing isoxazole from furoxan and phenylacetylene through a 1,3-cycloaddition mechanism. The original poster faces challenges with the placement of methyl and phenyl groups, suggesting instability without a sigmatropic rearrangement. A suggestion is made that unsymmetrically substituted furoxans can isomerize, potentially aiding the cycloaddition process. A reference to furoxan isomerization is provided for further reading. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clearer mechanism to achieve the desired synthesis.
Natalie456
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Provide a mechanism for the conversion of the furoxan with phenylacetylene and DMF to create the isoxazole.
Relevant Equations
1,3 - dipolar cycloaddition?
Screen Shot 2020-02-23 at 2.38.28 AM.png

I'm having difficulties uploading my work to this system at the moment, but I have currently attempted 1,3-cycloaddition between the furoxan and phenylacetylene. However, unless a sigmatropic rearrangement occurs (which, as far as I can conclude, leads to instability with charges), this places the methyl and phenyl groups in the incorrect places. Is there a better way to, perhaps, go about this mechanism? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Natalie456 said:
Homework Statement:: Provide a mechanism for the conversion of the furoxan with phenylacetylene and DMF to create the isoxazole.
Relevant Equations:: 1,3 - dipolar cycloaddition?

I'm having difficulties uploading my work to this system at the moment
Yeah unfortunately there aren't really any good options.

The only thing I can think to help you out with your question is that unsymmetrically substituted furoxans can sometimes isomerize between the two forms:
furoxan isomerization.png

This form gets you closer with 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition.

Edit: here's a reference to furoxan isomerization:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00519947

Further edit: obviously the tetravalent nitrogens have a +1 formal charge. Dunno why the drawing program didn't take care of that automatically.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top